1988
DOI: 10.1002/arch.940090103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sucrose‐dependent increase in oligosaccharide production and associated glycosidase activities in the potato aphid Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Thomas)

Abstract: Osmotic stress due to high sucrose concentration was imposed on the potato aphid, Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Thomas), in an artificial diet situation. Thin layer chromatography resolved melezitose and six additional honeydew oligosaccharides. Significantly higher levels of these oligosaccharides were recovered from the honeydew of this species in response to feeding on increased dietary sucrose concentrations, pointing to an osmoregulatory response. In addition, carbohydrase activities from the potato aphid were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Phloem-feeding insects assimilate only a proportion of the ingested sugar, after hydrolysis by the gut sucrase to its constituent monosaccharides (Rhodes et al, 1996;Ashford et al, 2000). In aphids, the osmotic pressure of the remaining sugar (which is voided in honeydew) is reduced by a gut transglucosidase, which catalyses the polymerisation of the monosaccharide, especially glucose, into oligosaccharides in the gut Walters and Mullin, 1988;Rhodes et al, 1997;Wilkinson et al, 1997;Ashford et al, 2000). In this way, aphids avoid losing water from their body fluids, especially their haemolymph, to the gut.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phloem-feeding insects assimilate only a proportion of the ingested sugar, after hydrolysis by the gut sucrase to its constituent monosaccharides (Rhodes et al, 1996;Ashford et al, 2000). In aphids, the osmotic pressure of the remaining sugar (which is voided in honeydew) is reduced by a gut transglucosidase, which catalyses the polymerisation of the monosaccharide, especially glucose, into oligosaccharides in the gut Walters and Mullin, 1988;Rhodes et al, 1997;Wilkinson et al, 1997;Ashford et al, 2000). In this way, aphids avoid losing water from their body fluids, especially their haemolymph, to the gut.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the plant species, the soluble carbohydrate in phloem sap can be almost exclusively in the form of the disaccharide sucrose (Zeigler, 1975). Interestingly, most of the excess sucrose ingested by whiteflies and aphids on a high sucrose diet is converted to other sugars before it is excreted (Fisher et al, 1984;Walters and Mullin, 1988;Byrne and Miller, 1991;Hendrix et al, 1992;Rhodes et al, 1997;Wilkinson et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sugar composition may be substantially different among different hemipteran species (Fischer & Shingleton 2001). The ability to transform the ingested disaccharide sucrose also differs significantly among hemipterans species (Fisher et al 1984;Walters & Mullin 1988). For instance, A. fabae and Macrosiphoniella tanacetaria (Kaltenbach) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) are not able to synthesize oligosaccharides, which may play an important role in aphid osmoregulation (Fisher et al 1984;Walters & Mullin 1988;Wilkinson et al 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to transform the ingested disaccharide sucrose also differs significantly among hemipterans species (Fisher et al 1984;Walters & Mullin 1988). For instance, A. fabae and Macrosiphoniella tanacetaria (Kaltenbach) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) are not able to synthesize oligosaccharides, which may play an important role in aphid osmoregulation (Fisher et al 1984;Walters & Mullin 1988;Wilkinson et al 1997). Symbiotic bacteria in hemipterans may also be responsible for the observed differences in the honeydew composition (Baumann et al 1995;Teo & Woodring 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%