Sucrose as an analgesic in relieving procedural pain in neonates

Basnet, Sijan; Shrestha, L Joshi; Shrestha, Prakash Sundar

doi:10.3233/npm-2010-0132

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The authors determined that non-nutritive sucking used together with music therapy reduced neonatal pain during heel-sticks [105]. Also, a number of studies demonstrated a beneficial effect of oral sucrose on neonatal procedural pain caused by heel-sticks, intramuscular injections, and venepunctures [107,108,109,110]. Further, Acharya et al published an article showing that oral sucrose not only reduced pain in term but also preterm infants [111].…”

Section: Acute Procedural Pain and Anxiety: A Complex Issuementioning

confidence: 99%

Paediatric Pain Medicine: Pain Differences, Recognition and Coping Acute Procedural Pain in Paediatric Emergency Room

Pancekauskaitė

Jankauskaitė

2018

Medicina

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Paediatric pain and its assessment and management are challenging for medical professionals, especially in an urgent care environment. Patients in a paediatric emergency room (PER) often undergo painful procedures which are an additional source of distress, anxiety, and pain. Paediatric procedural pain is often underestimated and neglected because of various myths, beliefs, and difficulties in its evaluation and treatment. However, it is very different from other origins of pain as it can be preventable. It is known that neonates and children can feel pain and that it has long-term effects that last through childhood into adulthood. There are a variety of pain assessment tools for children and they should be chosen according to the patient’s age, developmental stage, communication skills, and medical condition. Psychological factors such as PER environment, preprocedural preparation, and parental involvement should also be considered. There are proven methods to reduce a patient’s pain and anxiety during different procedures in PER. Distraction techniques such as music, videogames, virtual reality, or simple talk about movies, friends, or hobbies as well as cutaneous stimulation, vibration, cooling sprays, or devices are effective to alleviate procedural pain and anxiety. A choice of distraction technique should be individualized, selecting children who could benefit from nonpharmacological pain treatment methods or tools. Nonpharmacological pain management may reduce dosage of pain medication or exclude pharmacological pain management. Most nonpharmacological treatment methods are cheap, easily accessible, and safe to use on every child, so it should always be a first choice when planning a patient’s care. The aim of this review is to provide a summary of paediatric pain features, along with their physiology, assessment, management, and to highlight the importance and efficacy of nonpharmacological pain management in an urgent paediatric care setting.

show abstract

Section: Acute Procedural Pain and Anxiety: A Complex Issuementioning

confidence: 99%

Paediatric Pain Medicine: Pain Differences, Recognition and Coping Acute Procedural Pain in Paediatric Emergency Room

Pancekauskaitė

Jankauskaitė

2018

Medicina

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…PICO question comparisons that were prioritised by the NPGG in their discussions were those involving breastfeeding, oral sugar, expressed breastmilk, skin-to-skin care, and non-nutritive sucking. 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 ...…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…58 studies (n=3948) directly compared oral sugar solutions with placebo or no intervention. 24 , 42 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 50 (86%) studies showed sugar to be superior in narrative synthesis, 24 , 42 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of locally relevant clinical guidelines for procedure-related neonatal analgesic practice in Kenya: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Wade

Frazer

Qian

et al. 2020

The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary Background Increasing numbers of neonates are undergoing painful procedures in low-income and middle-income countries, with adequate analgesia seldom used. In collaboration with a multi-disciplinary team in Kenya, we aimed to establish the first evidence-based guidelines for the management of routine procedure-related neonatal pain that consider low-resource hospital settings. Methods We did a systematic review by searching MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and CENTRAL databases for studies published from Jan 1, 1953, to March 31, 2019. We included data from randomised controlled trials using heart rate, oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ), premature infant pain profile (PIPP) score, neonatal infant pain scale (NIPS) score, neonatal facial coding system score, and douleur aiguë du nouveau-né scale score as pain outcome measures. We excluded studies in which neonates were undergoing circumcision or were intubated, studies from which data were unextractable, or when pain was scored by non-trained individuals. We did a narrative synthesis of all studies, and meta-analysis when data were available from multiple studies comparing the same analgesics and controls and using the same outcome measures. 17 Kenyan health-care professionals formed our clinical guideline development panel, and we used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework and the panel's knowledge of the local health-care context to guide the guideline development process. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42019126620. Findings Of 2782 studies assessed for eligibility, data from 149 (5%) were analysed, with 80 (3%) of these further contributing to our meta-analysis. We found a high level of certainty for the superiority of breastfeeding over placebo or no intervention (standardised mean differences [SMDs] were −1·40 [95% CI −1·96 to −0·84] in PIPP score and −2·20 [–2·91 to −1·48] in NIPS score), and the superiority of oral sugar solutions over placebo or no intervention (SMDs were −0·38 [–0·61 to −0·16] in heart rate and 0·23 [0·04 to 0·42] in SpO 2 ). We found a moderate level of certainty for the superiority for expressed breastmilk over placebo or no intervention (SMDs were −0·46 [95% CI −0·87 to −0·05] in heart rate and 0·48 [0·20 to 0·75] in SpO 2 ). Therefore, the panel recommended that breastfeeding should be given as first-line analgesic treatment, initiated at least 2 min pre-procedure. Given contextual factors, for neonates who are unable to breastfeed, 1–2 mL of expressed breastmilk should be given as first-line analgesic, or 1–2 mL of oral sugar (≥10% concentration) as second-line analgesic. The panel also recommended parental presence during procedures with adjunctive provision of skin-to-skin care, or non-nutritive sucking when possible. Interpretation We have generated Kenya's first neonatal analgesic guidelin...

show abstract