Abstract:Mammalian infants must be able to integrate the acquisition, transport, and swallowing of food in order to effectively feed. Understanding how these processes are coordinated is critical, as they have differences in neural control and sensitivity to perturbation. Despite this, most studies of infant feeding focus on isolated processes, resulting in a limited understanding of the role of sensorimotor integration in the different processes involved in infant feeding. This is especially problematic in the context… Show more
“…Suck amplitude and length were measured following published protocols at the time of maximal suck generation (Geddes, Kent, Mitoulas, & Hartmann, 2008; Mayerl, Edmonds, Catchpole, et al, 2020). In short, suck amplitude was measured as the maximum dorsoventral distance between the hard palate and tongue during a suck cycle, and suck length was calculated as the distance from the nipple to the location of the tongue‐soft palate seal at the frame of maximum suck amplitude using ImageJ (Figure 1, Schneider, Rasband, & Eliceiri, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During feeding, infants use suction to acquire milk, and then move their tongue in a wave posteriorly to transport it to the valleculae (Elad et al, 2014; German et al, 1992). Tongue movements and suction generation during this process have been demonstrated to respond to sensory feedback (Mayerl et al, 2020), and infants use different neuromotor patterns and suction generation capacities depending on nipple properties and milk flow (Inoue, Sakashita, & Kamegai, 1995; Moral et al, 2010). After milk arrives in the valleculae, a swallow is triggered by sensory fibers associated with the internal superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) when a threshold volume is attained (Ding et al, 2013; Lang, Medda, Babaei, & Shaker, 2014), and the resulting swallow is thought to be primarily reflexive (Miller, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, different parts of the system vary in their sensitivity to sensory feedback. For example, movements of the tongue during swallowing are highly sensitive to bolus volume, whereas the movements of the hyoid and soft palate are less so (Mayerl, Edmonds, Catchpole, et al, 2020). This is most likely due to the reflexive nature of the pharyngeal swallow, with modulations in function arising in structures associated with food transport prior to swallowing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temporally, clinical videofluoroscopic recordings of infants are often limited to 15 fps to limit radiation exposure (Layly et al, 2020). This resolution is insufficient to measure the movements of the structures involved in sucking and swallowing, as an entire swallow can occur in less than 0.5 s, resulting in only four frames being acquired (Mayerl, Edmonds, Catchpole, et al, 2020).…”
Infants experiencing frequent aspiration, the entry of milk into the airway, are often prescribed thickened fluids to improve swallow safety. However, research on the outcomes of thickened milk on infant feeding have been limited to documenting rates of aspiration and the rheologic properties of milk following thickening. As a result, we have little insight into the physiologic and behavioral mechanisms driving differences in performance during feeding on high viscosity milk. Understanding the physiologic and behavioral mechanisms driving variation in performance at different viscosities is especially critical, because the structures involved in feeding respond differently to sensory stimulation. We used infant pigs, a validated animal model for infant feeding, to test how the tongue, soft palate, and hyoid respond to changes in viscosity during sucking and swallowing, in addition to measuring swallow safety and bolus size. We found that the tongue exhibited substantive changes in its movements associated with thickened fluids during sucking and swallowing, but that pharyngeal transit time as well as hyoid and soft palate movements during swallowing were unaffected. This work demonstrates the integrated nature of infant feeding and that behaviors associated with sucking are more sensitive to sensorimotor feedback associated with changes in milk viscosity than those associated with the pharyngeal swallow, likely due to its reflexive nature.
“…Suck amplitude and length were measured following published protocols at the time of maximal suck generation (Geddes, Kent, Mitoulas, & Hartmann, 2008; Mayerl, Edmonds, Catchpole, et al, 2020). In short, suck amplitude was measured as the maximum dorsoventral distance between the hard palate and tongue during a suck cycle, and suck length was calculated as the distance from the nipple to the location of the tongue‐soft palate seal at the frame of maximum suck amplitude using ImageJ (Figure 1, Schneider, Rasband, & Eliceiri, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During feeding, infants use suction to acquire milk, and then move their tongue in a wave posteriorly to transport it to the valleculae (Elad et al, 2014; German et al, 1992). Tongue movements and suction generation during this process have been demonstrated to respond to sensory feedback (Mayerl et al, 2020), and infants use different neuromotor patterns and suction generation capacities depending on nipple properties and milk flow (Inoue, Sakashita, & Kamegai, 1995; Moral et al, 2010). After milk arrives in the valleculae, a swallow is triggered by sensory fibers associated with the internal superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) when a threshold volume is attained (Ding et al, 2013; Lang, Medda, Babaei, & Shaker, 2014), and the resulting swallow is thought to be primarily reflexive (Miller, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, different parts of the system vary in their sensitivity to sensory feedback. For example, movements of the tongue during swallowing are highly sensitive to bolus volume, whereas the movements of the hyoid and soft palate are less so (Mayerl, Edmonds, Catchpole, et al, 2020). This is most likely due to the reflexive nature of the pharyngeal swallow, with modulations in function arising in structures associated with food transport prior to swallowing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temporally, clinical videofluoroscopic recordings of infants are often limited to 15 fps to limit radiation exposure (Layly et al, 2020). This resolution is insufficient to measure the movements of the structures involved in sucking and swallowing, as an entire swallow can occur in less than 0.5 s, resulting in only four frames being acquired (Mayerl, Edmonds, Catchpole, et al, 2020).…”
Infants experiencing frequent aspiration, the entry of milk into the airway, are often prescribed thickened fluids to improve swallow safety. However, research on the outcomes of thickened milk on infant feeding have been limited to documenting rates of aspiration and the rheologic properties of milk following thickening. As a result, we have little insight into the physiologic and behavioral mechanisms driving differences in performance during feeding on high viscosity milk. Understanding the physiologic and behavioral mechanisms driving variation in performance at different viscosities is especially critical, because the structures involved in feeding respond differently to sensory stimulation. We used infant pigs, a validated animal model for infant feeding, to test how the tongue, soft palate, and hyoid respond to changes in viscosity during sucking and swallowing, in addition to measuring swallow safety and bolus size. We found that the tongue exhibited substantive changes in its movements associated with thickened fluids during sucking and swallowing, but that pharyngeal transit time as well as hyoid and soft palate movements during swallowing were unaffected. This work demonstrates the integrated nature of infant feeding and that behaviors associated with sucking are more sensitive to sensorimotor feedback associated with changes in milk viscosity than those associated with the pharyngeal swallow, likely due to its reflexive nature.
“…33 Preterm infants are also lacking in reflexes for sucking and swallowing that could lead to feeding difficulties. 34 Periodic breathing can be seen in preterm and term infants. However, it occurs more often in preterm infants.…”
Section: Differences Of Preterm Infants and Term Infants Physical Appearance At Birthmentioning
Background: Preterm birth is defined as birth before 37 completed weeks of pregnancy. It is the most important predictor of adverse health and development infant outcomes that extend into the early childhood and beyond. It is also the leading cause of childhood mortality under 5 years of age worldwide and responsible for approximately one million neonatal deaths. It is also a significant contributor to childhood morbidities, with many survivors are facing an increased risk of lifelong disability and poor quality of life. Purpose: In this article, we aimed to describe features of preterm infants, what makes them different from term infants, and what to consider in nutritional management of preterm infants through a traditional narrative literature review. Discussion: Preterm infants are predisposed to more health complications than term infants with higher morbidity and mortality. This morbidity and mortality can be reduced through timely interventions for the mother and the preterm infant. Maternal interventions, such as health education and administration of micronutrient supplementation, are given before or during pregnancy and at delivery, whereas appropriate care for the preterm infants should be initiated immediately after birth, which include early breastfeeding and optimalization of weight gain. Conclusion: Essential care of the preterm infants and early aggressive nutrition should be provided to support rapid growth that is associated with improved neurodevelopmental outcomes. The goal is not only about survival but making sure that these preterm infants grow and develop without any residual morbidity.
Tongue function is vital for chewing and swallowing and lingual dysfunction is often associated with dysphagia. Better treatment of dysphagia depends on a better understanding of hyolingual morphology, biomechanics, and neural control in humans and animal models. Recent research has revealed significant variation among animal models in morphology of the hyoid chain and suprahyoid muscles which may be associated with variation in swallowing mechanisms. The recent deployment of XROMM (X-ray Reconstruction of Moving Morphology) to quantify 3D hyolingual kinematics has revealed new details on flexion and roll of the tongue during chewing in animal models, movements similar to those used by humans. XROMM-based studies of swallowing in macaques have falsified traditional hypotheses of mechanisms of tongue base retraction during swallowing, and literature review suggests that other animal models may employ a diversity of mechanisms of tongue base retraction. There is variation among animal models in distribution of hyolingual proprioceptors but how that might be related to lingual mechanics is unknown. In macaque monkeys, tongue kinematics—shape and movement—are strongly encoded in neural activity in orofacial primary motor cortex, giving optimism for development of brain–machine interfaces for assisting recovery of lingual function after stroke. However, more research on hyolingual biomechanics and control is needed for technologies interfacing the nervous system with the hyolingual apparatus to become a reality.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.