1935
DOI: 10.2307/2256152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Succession, Development, the Climax, and the Complex Organism: An Analysis of Concepts: Part II. Development and the Climax

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
3

Year Published

1975
1975
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The original concept of Clements (1916Clements ( , 1936, further developed by Phillips (1934Phillips ( , 1935aPhillips ( , 1935b, that the climax can be regarded as a superorganism, or organized functional whole, generally found little support. Gleason ( 1926Gleason ( , 1939 expressed the diametrically opposed view that the climax represented the sum of the individual characteristics of a fortuitous aggregation of plants as they found expression under the prevailing environmental conditions.…”
Section: The R-and K-configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original concept of Clements (1916Clements ( , 1936, further developed by Phillips (1934Phillips ( , 1935aPhillips ( , 1935b, that the climax can be regarded as a superorganism, or organized functional whole, generally found little support. Gleason ( 1926Gleason ( , 1939 expressed the diametrically opposed view that the climax represented the sum of the individual characteristics of a fortuitous aggregation of plants as they found expression under the prevailing environmental conditions.…”
Section: The R-and K-configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fire is probably a dominant factor in maintaining grasslands in areas that are climatically capable of growing either woody plants or grasses (Humphrey, 1962;Frost, 1984Frost, , 1996 and in most instances, fire may retard the development of vegetation (Phillips, 1935;Frost, 1985Frost, , 1996. Seedlings of various plant species rapidly grow into gaps created by fire.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have therefore attempted to define the rate of secondary succession by structural criteria, which do not depend on one's views about such controversial questions as mechanisms of succession or its progressiveness vs. progressivenessand-regressiveness (see e.g. Phillips 1935, Odum 1969.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%