Successful Treatment of Early Implant Failure: A Case Series

AlGhamdi, Ali Saad Thafeed

doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00267.x

Cited by 14 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 37 publications

(64 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The initial search yielded 75 articles. Scrutiny of the titles and abstracts abridged the number of studies to 10. Sixty‐five studies that did not abide by the inclusion criteria were excluded (see Appendix A).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical efficacy of antibiotics in the treatment of peri-implantitis

Javed

AlGhamdi

Ahmed

et al. 2013

International Dental Journal

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical efficacy of antibiotics in the treatment of peri-implantitis

Javed

AlGhamdi

Ahmed

et al. 2013

International Dental Journal

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[11] Similarly, in a recent case series, 18 implants undergoing early failure were treated successfully following the same protocol. [9]…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Early failing implants can be successfully managed by mechanical debridement, antimicrobial therapy, and guided bone regeneration (GBR). [9]…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Treatment of an early failing implant by guided bone regeneration using resorbable collagen membrane and bioactive glass

Talreja

Gayathri

Mehta

2013

J Indian Soc Periodontol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Implant failure can be divided into early (prior to prosthetic treatment) or late (after prosthetic rehabilitation). Early failure is generally due to interference in the healing process after implant placement. Implants undergoing early failure will show progressive bone loss on radiographs during the healing period (4 to 6 weeks). In the present case report, early progressive bone loss was seen at 6 weeks, after placement of a non-submerged single piece mini implant. Clinical examination revealed peri-implant bleeding on probing and pocket and grade-1 mobility. Treatment protocol included mechanical debridement (plastic curettes), chemical detoxification with supersaturated solution of citric acid, antibiotics and guided bone regeneration therapy using the collagen membrane as guided bone regeneration barrier in combination with bioactive glass as bone grafting material. The 6 month postoperative examination showed complete resolution of the osseous defect, thus suggesting that this technique may hold promise in the treatment of implants undergoing early failure.

show abstract

“…3 The amount of bone remodeling and resorption after the bone graft procedure is unpredictable, however, early detection and treatment of early progressive bone loss around the dental implants showed an improved implant failure rate. 37 The limitation of the study includes the use of data from a single surgical center with limited long term follow-up on many patients. In an attempt to minimize the radiographic measurement error and to ensure reliability, the same person performed the measurement.…”

Section: Dentoalveolar Reconstructive Procedures (Drp)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors Associated With Crestal Bone Loss Following Dental Implant Placement in a Longitudinal Follow-up Study

Kim

Dodson

Tien

et al. 2015

Journal of Oral Implantology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study is to estimate the magnitude of crestal bone loss and to identify factors associated with changes in crestal bone height following placement of dental implants. This was a retrospective cohort study, consisting of a sample derived from the population of patients who had at least 1 dental implant placed in a community practice over a 10-year period. A total of 11 predictor variables were grouped into demographic, related health status, anatomic, implant-specific, and operative categories. The primary outcome variable was a change in crestal bone height (mm) over the course of follow-up. The secondary outcome variable was crestal bone loss at 1 year grouped into 2 categories (bone loss >1.5 mm and ≤1.5 mm). Univariate and multivariate regression mixed-effects models were developed to identify variables associated with crestal bone level changes over time. P values ≤.05 were considered statistically significant. The study sample was composed of 85 subjects who received 148 implants. The mean change of the crestal bone was -2.1 ± 1.5 mm (range = -12.5 to 0.5 mm; median = -1.77 mm). In the multivariate model, none of the variables studied were statistically associated with mean crestal bone loss. Among 84 (66.1%) implants with bone loss >1.5 mm within 1 year, no variables were associated with bone loss in the multivariate model. Of the 11 predictor variables evaluated in this study, none were statistically significant with regard to an increased risk for crestal bone loss or for excessive bone loss within the first year after implant placement.

show abstract

Successful Treatment of Early Implant Failure: A Case Series

Cited by 14 publications

References 37 publications

Clinical efficacy of antibiotics in the treatment of peri-implantitis

Clinical efficacy of antibiotics in the treatment of peri-implantitis

Treatment of an early failing implant by guided bone regeneration using resorbable collagen membrane and bioactive glass

Factors Associated With Crestal Bone Loss Following Dental Implant Placement in a Longitudinal Follow-up Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About