Successful long‐term maintenance following Nutrition Care Process Terminology implementation across a state‐wide health‐care system

Vivanti, Angela; O’Sullivan, Therese A.; Porter, Jane; Hogg, Marion C.

doi:10.1111/1747-0080.12346

Cited by 13 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In Sweden, however, the implementation process started quite early, and knowledge about the NCP is widespread; thus, this result remains to be explained (30) . Earlier research regarding NCP, as well as other innovations, has identified support from workplace and management as being important requirements for successful implementation (18,19,23,27,(36)(37)(38)(39)(40) . Swedish and US studies have described professional isolation, with lack of support and understanding from management and workplace, especially in those who worked as the only dietitian in a multiprofessional environment and in rural areas (19,41) .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This is not surprising because the Nordic countries are often highlighted as early adopters of health information technology . The use of electronic health records has earlier been suggested as an important enabler in NCP implementation, although, because the Nordic countries still all have a rather low implementation level, other aspects might be more important .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Barriers and enablers in the implementation of a standardised process for nutrition care: findings from a multinational survey of dietetic professionals in 10 countries

Lövestam

Vivanti

Steiber

et al. 2020

J Human Nutrition Diet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background To explore the barriers and enablers experienced by nutrition and dietetic professionals in the implementation of the standardised Nutrition Care Process (NCP) across 10 different countries. NCP related beliefs, motivations and values were investigated and compared. Methods A validated online survey was disseminated to nutrition and dietetics professionals in 10 countries in the local language during 2017. Cross‐sectional associations and differences between countries were explored for level of implementation, barriers/enablers and attitudes/motivation among the respondents. Results Higher NCP implementation was associated with greater occurrence of enabling aspects, as well as fewer occurrences of barriers. The most common enabler was ‘recommendation by the national dietetic association’ (69%) and the most common barrier was ‘lack of time’ (39%). A longer experience of NCP use was associated with a more positive attitude towards all NCP aspects. Differences between countries were identified, regarding both the occurrence of barriers/enablers and attitudes/motivations. Conclusions Implementation efforts need to be tailored to country‐specific contexts when implementing a new standard of care framework among nutrition and dietetic professionals. Additional research is needed to further assess the management and workplace strategies to support the development of nutrition and dietetics professionals in multidisciplinary healthcare organisations.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Barriers and enablers in the implementation of a standardised process for nutrition care: findings from a multinational survey of dietetic professionals in 10 countries

Lövestam

Vivanti

Steiber

et al. 2020

J Human Nutrition Diet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Para estudiar la implementación y expansión internacional del PAN y los factores que la favorecen o limitan se han realizado diferentes trabajos. Entre ellos, el Proyecto INIS (International NCP/NCPT Implementation Survey), la mayor encuesta actualmente publicada, pone de manifiesto una tendencia creciente en el uso de los recursos relacionados con el PAN y la TE y la colaboración internacional en la investigación nutricional 9,10,25,28,49,50,[61][62][63] .…”

Section: Implementación Y Evaluación Del Proceso De Atención Nutriciounclassified

Proceso de Atención Nutricional: Elementos para su implementación y uso por los profesionales de la Nutrición y la Dietética

Carbajal

Sierra

López-Lora

et al. 2020

Rev Esp Nutr Hum Diet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introducción: El Proceso de Atención Nutricional (PAN) y la Terminología Estandarizada (TE) proporcionan un protocolo de actuación que permite fomentar el pensamiento crítico, estructurar y documentar el cuidado dietético-nutricional basado en la evidencia científica, medir los resultados y evaluar la calidad de la atención nutricional. Objetivo: Dar a conocer a los profesionales de la Nutrición y la Dietética el PAN y la TE, sus elementos básicos y su aplicación en la atención nutricional, evaluando su implementación internacional.Material y métodos: Revisión de los trabajos publicados del PAN y la TE en inglés y castellano. Términos de búsqueda: Nutrition Care Process, Dietetic Care Process, Standardized Terminology, Proceso/Plan de Atención/Cuidado Nutricional/Dietético y TE. La búsqueda no se limitó por año de publicación, excluyéndose los artículos publicados con baja evidencia científica o con cambios respecto al modelo original.Resultados: El PAN aporta un enfoque holístico y contribuye a mejorar la calidad asistencial, el intercambio de información y el seguimiento nutricional. La implementación del PAN mejora la productividad profesional y promueve y fortalece aún más las funciones del profesional de la Nutrición y la Dietética en la práctica sanitaria-comunitaria.Conclusiones: El PAN y la TE son reconocidos internacionalmente como herramientas necesarias para promover la atención y cuidado nutricional en clínica, salud pública e investigación nutricional, subrayando la necesidad de incluirlo en el currículo académico y en la práctica profesional de la Nutrición y la Dietética.

show abstract

“…For dietitians, this includes culturally appropriate, safe, ethical and effective practice, improving nutritional health, using and generating new evidence and effectively working with others to achieve our end users’ goals . Arguably, the Nutrition Care Process Terminology framework provides a structure in which to focus on quality, safe and effective nutrition outcomes for individuals and communities, which has been found to be accepted by the profession . The National Competency Standards for Dietitians in Australia provide the framework for workforce development and the Accreditation Standards provide scope with which to guide the preparation of the workforce.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Creating the dietitians of the future

Palermo

2017

Nutrition & Dietetics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Successful long‐term maintenance following Nutrition Care Process Terminology implementation across a state‐wide health‐care system

Abstract: Immediate improvements following the NCPT implementation project were sustained over three years. Moving forward, a professional focus on continuing to incorporate NCPT into standard practice will provide structure for process and outcomes assessment.

Cited by 13 publications

References 13 publications

Barriers and enablers in the implementation of a standardised process for nutrition care: findings from a multinational survey of dietetic professionals in 10 countries

Barriers and enablers in the implementation of a standardised process for nutrition care: findings from a multinational survey of dietetic professionals in 10 countries

Proceso de Atención Nutricional: Elementos para su implementación y uso por los profesionales de la Nutrición y la Dietética

Creating the dietitians of the future

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About