2018
DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.05.35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successful HeartMate 3 implantation in isolated right heart failure—first in man experience of right heart configuration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After 8 days, a HeartMate 3 (Abbott, Chicago, Ill) LVAD was implanted as a bridge to recovery. 1 , 2 Forty-two days later, the right ventricle showed sufficient recovery, and the temporary mechanical support was weaned off and a dual-chamber permanent pacemaker was implanted for complete heart block. However, 5 months later, the right ventricle failed again, tricuspid regurgitation became severe (mean right atrial pressure of 20 mm Hg), and a durable RVAD was needed.…”
Section: Clinical Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 8 days, a HeartMate 3 (Abbott, Chicago, Ill) LVAD was implanted as a bridge to recovery. 1 , 2 Forty-two days later, the right ventricle showed sufficient recovery, and the temporary mechanical support was weaned off and a dual-chamber permanent pacemaker was implanted for complete heart block. However, 5 months later, the right ventricle failed again, tricuspid regurgitation became severe (mean right atrial pressure of 20 mm Hg), and a durable RVAD was needed.…”
Section: Clinical Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Some groups have reported biventricular support by HVAD or HM3 in the clinical setting, but there is a lack of in vitro hemodynamic evaluation of the HM3 used as an RVAD for RHF. [8][9][10][11][12][13] Most notably, in their review of continuous-flow BVAD outcomes in 2021, Farag et al identified eight studies that used an HVAD for RVAD and three studies that used the HM3 for RVAD. 14 Although the HVAD is not available in the market, comparison with successful CF technologies such as the HVAD and HM3 represent value to study clinical characteristics of CF pumps used as BVAD configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical options for RVAD support are currently limited to two implantable LVADs or temporary device support, and implantation modalities may vary depending on the individual surgeon’s decision and device availability 7 . Some groups have reported biventricular support by HVAD or HM3 in the clinical setting, but there is a lack of in vitro hemodynamic evaluation of the HM3 used as an RVAD for RHF 8–13 . Most notably, in their review of continuous‐flow BVAD outcomes in 2021, Farag et al identified eight studies that used an HVAD for RVAD and three studies that used the HM3 for RVAD 14 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The HVAD (HeartWare, Framingham, MA) and HeartMate 3 (Abbott, North Chicago, IL-HM3) have been reportedly used for biventricular support but isolated right ventricular assist device (RVAD) implantation is still rare. [2][3][4]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%