2018
DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successes and challenges in optimizing the viral load cascade to improve antiretroviral therapy adherence and rationalize second‐line switches in Swaziland

Abstract: IntroductionAs antiretroviral therapy (ART) is scaled up, more patients become eligible for routine viral load (VL) monitoring, the most important tool for monitoring ART efficacy. For HIV programmes to become effective, leakages along the VL cascade need to be minimized and treatment switching needs to be optimized. However, many HIV programmes in resource‐constrained settings report significant shortfalls.MethodsFrom a public sector HIV programme in rural Swaziland, we evaluated the VL cascade of adults (≥18… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous reports from sub‐Saharan African settings have consistently shown low and delayed switching from first‐ to second‐line ART (even when VL‐monitoring is present), which have been linked to poorer treatment outcomes, increased mortality and the risk of the development and transmission of resistance . In our sites, 80% of first‐line treatment failures were switched to second‐line, an encouraging figure that is higher than in similar programmes (43%, Swaziland; 33%, Mozambique ). However, even 80% is insufficient.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous reports from sub‐Saharan African settings have consistently shown low and delayed switching from first‐ to second‐line ART (even when VL‐monitoring is present), which have been linked to poorer treatment outcomes, increased mortality and the risk of the development and transmission of resistance . In our sites, 80% of first‐line treatment failures were switched to second‐line, an encouraging figure that is higher than in similar programmes (43%, Swaziland; 33%, Mozambique ). However, even 80% is insufficient.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Previous reports from sub-Saharan African settings have consistently shown low and delayed switching from first-to second-line ART (even when VL-monitoring is present), which have been linked to poorer treatment outcomes, increased mortality and the risk of the development and transmission of resistance [8,32,[60][61][62][63]. In our sites, 80% of first-line treatment failures were switched to second-line, an encouraging figure that is higher than in similar programmes (43%, Swaziland; 33%, Mozambique [50,64] three-test failure algorithm or the non-capture of VL-tests in the electronic database. Encouragingly, in 2016 MOH guidelines lowered the failure confirmation threshold from 5000 to 1000 cps/mL [45], and since 2018 follow-up VL-testing for suspect failures is independent of good adherence [46], thus further streamlining VL scale-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Of those with confirmatory viral load, the majority were confirmed as failures. This is a lot more than usually observed [36], but could be explained by a selection bias from the clinical staff.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 73%
“…The primary outcomes of interest were the proportion of patients with i) an elevated VL and ii) confirmed virologic failure after AC entry. An elevated VL was defined as a VL >1000 copies/mL after AC entry [21]. Confirmed virologic failure was defined as two consecutive VLs >1000 copies/mL performed within a 12‐month window.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%