Point‐of‐care viral load monitoring: outcomes from a decentralized HIV programme in Malawi

Abstract

Introduction Routinely monitoring the HIV viral load ( VL ) of people living with HIV ( PLHIV ) on anti‐retroviral therapy ( ART ) facilitates intensive adherence counselling and faster ART regimen switch when treatment failure is indicated. Yet standard VL ‐testing in centralized laboratories can be time‐intensive and logistically difficult in low‐resource settings. This paper evaluates the outcomes of the first four years of routine VL ‐monitoring using Point‐of‐Care technology, implemented by Médecins Sans Frontières ( MSF ) in rural clinics in Malawi. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients eligible for routine VL ‐ testing between 2013 and 2017 in four decentralized ART ‐clinics and the district hospital in Chiradzulu, Malawi. We assessed VL ‐testing coverage and the treatment failure cascade (from suspected failure (first VL >1000 copies/ mL ) to VL suppression post regimen switch). We used descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression to assess factors associated with suspected failure. Results and Discussion Among 21,400 eligible patients, VL ‐testing coverage was 85% and VL suppression was found in 89% of those tested. In the decentralized clinics, 88% of test results were reviewed on the same day as blood collection, whereas in the district hospital the median turnaround‐time for results was 85 days. Among first‐line ART patients with suspected failure (N = 1544), 30% suppressed ( VL <1000 copies/ mL ), 35% were treatment failures (confirmed by subsequent VL ‐testing) and 35% had incomplete VL follow‐up. Among treatment failures, 80% (N = 540) were switched to a second‐line regimen, with a higher switching rate in the decentralized clinics than in the district hospital (86% vs. 67%, p < 0.01) and a shorter median time‐to‐switch (6.8 months vs. 9.7 months, p < 0.01). Similarly, the post‐switch VL ‐testing rate was markedly higher in the decentralized clinics (61% vs. 26%, p < 0.01). Overall, 79% of patients with a post‐switch VL ‐test were suppressed. Conclusions Viral load testing at the point‐of‐care in Chiradzulu, Malawi achieved high coverage and good drug regimen switch rates among those identified as treatment failures. In...

Factors Associated with Antiretroviral Treatments Failure among HIV-Positive Patients in Congo: A Retrospective Cohort Study

“…In this study carried out among patients initiating antiretroviral treatments and a follow-up in a long period of 14 years, patients experienced frequently episodes of treatment failure, despite an improvement in access to treatment over the last decade in the Congo, which is consistent with previous studies in AR-treated patients in sub-Saharan African countries [19] [20] [21]. The fact that most of HIV patients treated in Congo having difficulties to achieve undetectable viral load over follow-up can lead to high mortality and limits the effect of treatment as prevention (TasP), thus leading to the persistence of the epidemic.…”

“I just believe there is a risk” understanding of undetectable equals untransmissible (U = U) among health providers and HIV‐negative partners in serodiscordant relationships in Kenya

“…Therefore, the concern raised by providers is a critical barrier to U = U implementation and the health system should be strengthened to support provision of timely viral load results. Additionally, innovations such as point of care viral load monitoring being implemented in some settings could help in the rollout of U = U in resource constrained settings and increase provider and patient confidence in this important strategy .…”

Cost-Effectiveness of Adoption Strategies for Point of Care HIV Viral Load Monitoring in South Africa

“…Sufficient budget for viral load testing would have to be available to achieve this particular goal. A number of studies have assessed POC diagnostic accuracy of [16À21], costs [9], cost-effectiveness [10] and clinical outcomes [6,8,22] relative to centralized testing, but to our knowledge, this is the first paper that has assessed the feasibility of different adoption strategies for POC viral load monitoring on a national scale. This analysis is also novel in that it incorporates both costs and clinical outcomes and uses facility-level data to match viral load demand to equipment capacity in order to minimize costs.…”