Success Measurement Framework for Information Technology Project: a Conceptual Model

Sulistiyani, Endang; Tyas, Sasmi Yulianing

doi:10.1109/icomitee.2019.8921174

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The survey questions indicate the variables adopted in a research study (Reardon, 2006). The measures presented in Table 1 and Sulistiyani and Tyas (2019). Table 1 maps each measure to their respective IS project success constructs and continuum dimension.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…speak to three project benefit components: (i) specificity, (ii) attainability and (iii) comprehensiveness. IS projects apply the same philosophy as business success centres on ensuring the business motives of the project are met through the realisation of the business case and benefits (Bannerman & Thorogood, 2012;Sulistiyani & Tyas, 2019). A question arises regarding how do the short and medium-term dimensions of project success affect a long-term dimension that is traditionally assessed post-project (Albert et al, 2017).…”

Section: Medium-term Successmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The general concept of project success has evolved from the triple constraint to be more inclusive of stakeholder and organisational dimensions (Albert et al, 2017). An emergent pattern is assessing IS project success across multiple dimensions as relying on immediate or short-term success is unjust in determining overall project success (Marnewick et al, 2017;Sulistiyani & Tyas, 2019). A practical example is the Sydney Opera House which exceeded time and cost but was a long-term success.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…IS project success variables operationalised from literature. Adapted fromBannerman (2008),Bannerman and Thorogood (2012),Petter et al (2013), Joseph (2017 andSulistiyani and Tyas (2019) …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The Continuum of Information Systems Project Success: Reflecting on the Correlation between Project Success Dimensions

Joseph

Marnewick

2021

SACJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Information systems (IS) project success has been a perennial bane of many researchers. Although there are short, medium and long-term dimensions to success, the reality is that they are inseparably linked. Time plays a significant role as a stakeholder, such as a project manager who has short-term interests. In contrast, a business executive has long-term interests for the organisation as a whole. Project success is arguably a continuum where each dimension plays a role in realising long-term benefits for the organisation. This research investigates IS projects specifically to understand the argued correlation between short, medium and long-term project success dimensions. A total of 612 valid responses were collected through an online questionnaire. Quantitative analysis through PLS-SEM was conducted to reveal the correlation between success dimensions. The overall implication is that short-term IS project success does not directly correlate with long-term IS project success. However, there is a clear correlation between the time phases of IS project success. This research shows medium-term success mediates the relationship and correlation of short and long-term success. While literature acknowledges the relationship literature, this research confirms this notion and proves a significant correlation between each IS project success dimension over time.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Medium-term Successmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…IS project success variables operationalised from literature. Adapted fromBannerman (2008),Bannerman and Thorogood (2012),Petter et al (2013), Joseph (2017 andSulistiyani and Tyas (2019) …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations