2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2015.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subvisible (2–100 μm) particle analysis during biotherapeutic drug product development: Part 2, experience with the application of subvisible particle analysis

Abstract: Measurement and characterization of subvisible particles (including proteinaceous and non-proteinaceous particulate matter) is an important aspect of the pharmaceutical development process for biotherapeutics. Health authorities have increased expectations for subvisible particle data beyond criteria specified in the pharmacopeia and covering a wider size range. In addition, subvisible particle data is being requested for samples exposed to various stress conditions and to support process/product changes. Cons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In solutions for injection supplied in containers with a nominal content of less than 100 mL, particles !10 mm and !25 mm are controlled by a light obscuration (LO) method at or below 6000 particles/container and 600 particles/container, respectively. In addition to LO, various methods such as flow imaging, qLD, resonance mass measurement, and nanoparticle tracking analysis are reported to be useful for detection and quantification of subvisible particles of less than 10 mm in size, [34][35][36][37] although it remains unclear what type of subvisible particles should be controlled for and where to set the optimal cutoff for the number of allowable subvisible particles in a product.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In solutions for injection supplied in containers with a nominal content of less than 100 mL, particles !10 mm and !25 mm are controlled by a light obscuration (LO) method at or below 6000 particles/container and 600 particles/container, respectively. In addition to LO, various methods such as flow imaging, qLD, resonance mass measurement, and nanoparticle tracking analysis are reported to be useful for detection and quantification of subvisible particles of less than 10 mm in size, [34][35][36][37] although it remains unclear what type of subvisible particles should be controlled for and where to set the optimal cutoff for the number of allowable subvisible particles in a product.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current specifications require that particles >10 µm and 25 µm in size are reported (United States Pharmacopoeia < 788 >). Particles <10 µm in size are currently not required to be monitored; however, their significance in autoimmune responses and product quality is an area of significant debate . The emergence of technologies such as MFI enables monitoring of particles as small as 1 µm in size, and we therefore report SVPs in the range 1–100 µm in size.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A flow cytometer equipped with forward-and side-scattering as well as fluorescent detectors, is able to determine the number of subvisible particles in monoclonal antibody formulations [48]. Moreover, industry case studies have illustrated how strategies for subvisible particle analysis are being developed to assess the nature and amount of particulate matter for better drug product development or stability studies [49].…”
Section: Undissolved Solids In Drug Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%