1995
DOI: 10.3354/meps125013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subtropical Australian juvenile fish eat meiofauna:experiments with winter whiting Sillago maculata and observations on other species

Abstract: Meiofauna are known to be trophically integrated into estuarine food webs in temperate regions primarily as food for bottom-feeding juvenile fishes. In subtroplcal/tropical mangrovedominated estuaries there were few data indicating juvenile fish utilized meiofauna for food. After determining several fishes that ate meiofauna in southeastern Queensland, Australia,,juvenile winter whiting Sillago maculata were allowed to feed on natural mud-dwelling meiofaunal communities in microcosms. Six juvenile whiting (21 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar pattern was also found in the profundal of Lake Brunsee, where the benthic community was dominated by nematodes followed by rotifers (Bergtold and Traunspurger, 2004). Additionally, other studies showed that soft bottoms are generally dominated by nematodes (e.g., Holopainen and Passivirta, 1977;Traunspurger, 2002;Wu et al, 2004), whereas hard bottoms are generally dominated by harpacticoid copepods, isopods and amphipods, whereas nematodes accounted for a minor fraction (Coull et al, 1983(Coull et al, , 1995Danovaro, 1996;Danovaro and Fraschetti, 2002).…”
Section: Meio-and Macrofauna Development During Decompositionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…A similar pattern was also found in the profundal of Lake Brunsee, where the benthic community was dominated by nematodes followed by rotifers (Bergtold and Traunspurger, 2004). Additionally, other studies showed that soft bottoms are generally dominated by nematodes (e.g., Holopainen and Passivirta, 1977;Traunspurger, 2002;Wu et al, 2004), whereas hard bottoms are generally dominated by harpacticoid copepods, isopods and amphipods, whereas nematodes accounted for a minor fraction (Coull et al, 1983(Coull et al, , 1995Danovaro, 1996;Danovaro and Fraschetti, 2002).…”
Section: Meio-and Macrofauna Development During Decompositionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Reilly et al, 1992;Coull et al, 1995;Platell et al, 1997). This probably reflects the fact that their relatively large mouths (cf.…”
Section: Ontogenetic Changes Mouth Morphology and Foraging Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Community macrozoobenthos invertebrates important in demonstrating biodiversity, ecosystem health and play an important role as a component of trophic important in the food web (Coull et al, 1995;MacFarlane and Booth, 2001;Yap et al, 2003;Azrina et al, 2006). One group of invertebrates, which are often used in environmental monitoring are gastropods.…”
Section: Gastropodsmentioning
confidence: 99%