2011
DOI: 10.1071/as10023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subtraction of Bright Point Sources from Synthesis Images of the Epoch of Reionization

Abstract: Bright point sources associated with extragalactic active galactic nuclei and radio galaxies are an important foreground for low-frequency radio experiments aimed at detecting the redshifted 21-cm emission from neutral hydrogen during the epoch of reionization. The frequency dependence of the synthesized beam implies that the sidelobes of these sources will move across the field of view as a function of observing frequency, hence frustrating line-of-sight foreground subtraction techniques. We describe a method… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, with various modifications, many of the standard deconvolution approaches can be used to accurately remove PSF sidelobes, and developments are being made on a number of complementary fronts, see for example Pindor et al (2011), Bernardi et al (2011), Williams et al (2012, I. Sullivan et al (2012), Mitchell et al (2012), and G. Bernardi et al (2012).…”
Section: Tingay Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with various modifications, many of the standard deconvolution approaches can be used to accurately remove PSF sidelobes, and developments are being made on a number of complementary fronts, see for example Pindor et al (2011), Bernardi et al (2011), Williams et al (2012, I. Sullivan et al (2012), Mitchell et al (2012), and G. Bernardi et al (2012).…”
Section: Tingay Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…has been obtained, the remaining major challenge will be the separation of the EoR signal from the astrophysical foregrounds. Foreground removal is generally considered to be a three stage process: bright source removal (e.g., Di Matteo et al 2004;Pindor et al 2011;Bernardi et al 2011), spectral fitting (e.g., Shaver et al 1999;Santos et al 2005;Wang et al 2006;McQuinn et al 2006;Bowman et al 2006;Jelić et al 2008;Harker et al 2009aHarker et al , 2010Petrovic & Oh 2011;Trott et al 2012), and residual error subtraction (Morales & Hewitt 2004) though efforts have been made to merge these steps (Gleser et al 2008;Mao 2012;Petrovic & Oh 2011).…”
Section: Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reality, there are many issues which make an accurate subtraction of point sources from radio interferometric wide-field synthesis images challenging. These include residual gain calibration errors (Datta et al, 2010), direction dependence of the calibration due to instrumental or ionospheric/atmospheric conditions (Intema et al, 2009;Yatawatta, 2012), the effect of spectral index of the sources (Rau & Cornwell, 2011), frequency dependence and asymmetry of the primary beam response, varying point spread function (synthesized beam) of the telescope (Liu et al, 2009a;Morales et al, 2012;Ghosh et al, 2012), high computational expenses of imaging a large field of view, and CLEANing a large number of point sources (particularly severe at low radio frequency images, Pindor et al, 2011) etc. Note that these issues are more prominent at low radio frequencies due to a comparatively large field of view as well as a large number of strong point sources and bright Galactic synchrotron emission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%