2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.09.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subsurface temperature model of the Hungarian part of the Pannonian Basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(103 reference statements)
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The three 'modelled maps' presented confirm the regional settings of the studied PB area as having elevated heat flow values (Lenkey et al, 2002), higher than average 65 mW/m 2 estimated for continents (Jaupart, Labrosse, Lucazeau, & Mareschal, 2015;Pollack, Hurter, & Johnson, 1993), resulting in higher geothermal gradient than Earth's average. Although, it is worth noting that, surface heat flow values determined in the calibration process of the 3D basin modelling in certain places showed significantly lower results than those presented in Lenkey et al (2002) and Békési et al (2017). Also, estimated values of geothermal gradient were in certain areas lower than those presented in Jelić, Kevrić, and Krasić (1995) and Kurevija et al (2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The three 'modelled maps' presented confirm the regional settings of the studied PB area as having elevated heat flow values (Lenkey et al, 2002), higher than average 65 mW/m 2 estimated for continents (Jaupart, Labrosse, Lucazeau, & Mareschal, 2015;Pollack, Hurter, & Johnson, 1993), resulting in higher geothermal gradient than Earth's average. Although, it is worth noting that, surface heat flow values determined in the calibration process of the 3D basin modelling in certain places showed significantly lower results than those presented in Lenkey et al (2002) and Békési et al (2017). Also, estimated values of geothermal gradient were in certain areas lower than those presented in Jelić, Kevrić, and Krasić (1995) and Kurevija et al (2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Stratigraphic and lithological outline was obtained from Lučić et al, 2001;Saftić et al, 2003 andPavelić &Kovačić, 2018, in which the main stratigraphic contacts are defined with their corresponding ages and lithological composition of stratigraphic units. For estimation of the heat flow, the input data were obtained from works that are of regional coverage (Békési et al, 2017;Lenkey, Dövényi, Horváth, & Cloething, 2002) with local corrections from Cvetković, Emanović, Stopar, and Slavinić (2018) and calibration data from wells acquired from published sources (Energy Institute Hrvoje Požar & Orkustofnun, 2017; Kolenković, 2012;Kurevija & Vulin, 2011;Kurevija, Kljaić, & Vulin, 2010;Kurevija, Vulin, & Macenić, 2014;Macenić & Kurevija, 2018;Novak Zelenika, 2005). Input data regarding paleo-water depth (PWD) values were taken from regional studies (Ćorić et al, 2009;Krijgsman, Stoica, Vasiliev, & Popov, 2010;Lučić et al, 2001;Magyar, Geary, & Müller, 1999;Pavelić, 2001;Pavelić & Kovačić, 2018;Rögl, 1996Rögl, , 1998.…”
Section: Input Data For the Supplemental Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regional scale groundwater flow model exist for the porous sediments in the Great Hungarian Plain (VISZKOK 2001) and for the karstic water flow in the carbonates in the Transdanubian Range (CSEPREGI & LORBE -RER 1989), but in these models heat transport was not taken into account. On the other hand, lithospheric scale 3D conductive heat transport models exist for Hungary (BÉKÉSI et al 2017) and for the western part of the Pannonian basin (LENKEY et al 2017). In the first model the thermal conductivity and heat production of rocks was varied according to EMERICK & REYNOLDS (2013) in order to fit the calculated temperatures to the observed ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this model, the main heat source is provided by the Pleistocene magmatic melts, whereas the presence of faults further enhances the recharge of meteoric waters [76]. A similar heating source was developed in Hungary as a result of a Miocene extension that caused a high thermal attenuation of the lithosphere [82,83]. In the current study, the elevated water temperatures were mainly observed close to the basaltic rock occurrences (T = 30.2 and 23.0 • C for GTES-038 and GTES-040 groundwater irrigations wells, respectively).…”
Section: Indications Of Enhanced Heatmentioning
confidence: 99%