2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substructure system identification from coupled system test data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A SS system may be used as a physical representation of a machine (Lembregts, Leuridan, & Van Brussel, 1990;Petersen, Fraanje, Cazzolato, Zander, & Hansen, 2008;Sjövall & Abrahamsson, 2007, 2008, or as a general tool for specifying models that serve as predictors of the system (Lardies, 1998(Lardies, , 2008 either by itself or in a Condition Monitoring program, integrating Reliability Centered Maintenance and Remote Condition Monitoring (García, Schmid, & Conde, 2003;Pedregal, García, & Schmid, 2004). Especially related to this paper is Sjövall and Abrahamsson (2008), because they use also a continuous time SS model, though applied to the reconstruction of the interface forces acting between the unknown subsystem and its neighbour.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A SS system may be used as a physical representation of a machine (Lembregts, Leuridan, & Van Brussel, 1990;Petersen, Fraanje, Cazzolato, Zander, & Hansen, 2008;Sjövall & Abrahamsson, 2007, 2008, or as a general tool for specifying models that serve as predictors of the system (Lardies, 1998(Lardies, , 2008 either by itself or in a Condition Monitoring program, integrating Reliability Centered Maintenance and Remote Condition Monitoring (García, Schmid, & Conde, 2003;Pedregal, García, & Schmid, 2004). Especially related to this paper is Sjövall and Abrahamsson (2008), because they use also a continuous time SS model, though applied to the reconstruction of the interface forces acting between the unknown subsystem and its neighbour.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang and Chuang 9 proposed a new method to identify the structural joint parameters directly from the FRFs of the substructures and the whole structure. P Sjo¨vall and T Abrahamsson 10 identified the substructure systems from coupled system test data. The method was based on reconstruction of the interface forces acting between the unknown subsystem and its neighbor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This contributes to the low computational cost of the problem, which is particularly important because the identification of subsystems is a preprocessing step in SEA calculation, and one of the main features of SEA is its low computational cost. Finally, it is worth mentioning that subsystem identification is not only a topic of interest for SEA applications like [18] but also in the analysis of mechanical systems/problems in general, see for example [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%