1976
DOI: 10.2320/matertrans1960.17.139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substructural Strengthening by Hot Working in Two <I>FCC</I> Materials

Abstract: Subgrain size of austenitic stainless steel type SUS304L and high purity aluminium deformed in torsion at various strain rates and temperatures was measured. And room temperature compression tests were carried out on these samples with subgrain size ranging from about 0.5 to 6,um for austenitic stainless steel and from about 2 to 30 µm for aluminium. The preservation of subgrains formed during high temperature deformation leads to the enhancement of the subsequent mechanical properties of the material. The roo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not comparable to a Hall-Petch relationship since each flow stress is at a different temperature so that c is not the strength of material without substructure and may be zero. In the data for AI, the strength is greater at a given subgrain size for commercial material and the strengthening coefficient e is larger [40,47,49,[52][53][54] due to specific impurities [25,55,56]. Alternatively, at a given Z, the substructure is much finer because of impurity particles and hence the strength is considerably greater.…”
Section: Subgrains Dynamic Recovery Andflolv Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is not comparable to a Hall-Petch relationship since each flow stress is at a different temperature so that c is not the strength of material without substructure and may be zero. In the data for AI, the strength is greater at a given subgrain size for commercial material and the strengthening coefficient e is larger [40,47,49,[52][53][54] due to specific impurities [25,55,56]. Alternatively, at a given Z, the substructure is much finer because of impurity particles and hence the strength is considerably greater.…”
Section: Subgrains Dynamic Recovery Andflolv Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…values generally lie respectively between 2 and 5 and 0.04 and 0.06 MPa -I [8,25,98,100]. The activation energy rises regularly with Mg content from 130-160kJjmoi to IS0-200kJjmoi [6,8,21,25,43,54,80,97,100]. For the commercial purity Mg alloys, the values rise more rapidly but with much more scatter [8,25,73].…”
Section: Flow Stress Dependence On Mg Content Temperature and Strainmentioning
confidence: 99%