2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevmaterials.2.104403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substantial enhancement of thermal spin polarization in Py/Cu interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we did not observe a thermal spin signal in configuration of Py/Cu/CFA even an AC bias current of 4.3 mA, as shown in figure 6(b). This can be understood by considering the low spin-dependent Seebeck coefficient of Py at room temperature [39]. We can also see that the base values of the thermal spin curves are much lower for both measurement configurations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, we did not observe a thermal spin signal in configuration of Py/Cu/CFA even an AC bias current of 4.3 mA, as shown in figure 6(b). This can be understood by considering the low spin-dependent Seebeck coefficient of Py at room temperature [39]. We can also see that the base values of the thermal spin curves are much lower for both measurement configurations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Here, we assume that the spin diffusion length of CoFeAl and Py are λ CoFeAl = 2 nm and λ Py = 2 nm at 295 K. Because the electron spin relaxations in the Py, CFA, and Cu are dominated by the Elliott-Yafet mechanism, we can assume the product of spin diffusion length and resistivity is constant for them [37,38]. The products of spin diffusion length and resistivity are γ CFA = λ CFA × ρ CFA = 0.9 fΩ • m 2 , γ Py = λ Py × ρ Py = 0.71 fΩ • m 2 and γ Cu = λ Cu × ρ Cu = 13.28 fΩ • m 2 , respectively [23,39]. By fitting the interval distance dependence of the spin signals in figure 2(c) using equation (1), we estimated the spin polarizations of CFA as 0.62 and 0.82 at 295 K and 35 K. For Py, the spin polarizations are 0.35 and To further understand the spin transport properties in the confined spin channel, we also evaluated the temperature dependence of the spin signals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which the contributions from up-spin and down-spin cancel out each other. [55,56] Owing to the relatively small S xx , S ↑ , and S ↓ represent the similar temperature dependence of S xy with accompanying the sign reversal. The underlying physical mechanism responsible for the observed sign reversal of the ANE voltage is intricately linked to the temperature-induced variations in the spin-dependent Seebeck effect.…”
Section: Figure 5amentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Thermal gradients at the crucial ferromagnet/non-magnetic metal interface can also drive spin injection in the structure in what is often termed the spin-dependent Seebeck effect (SDSE). [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] The dramatic consequences of the interaction of heat and spin place NLSVs firmly in the growing field of spin caloritronics [40][41][42] that examines coupling between heat and spin in materials and devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%