Abstract:Data from the California Healthy Kids Survey of 7th, 9th, and 11th graders were used to identify latent classes/clusters of alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana use (N=418,702). Analyses revealed four latent classes of substance use which included non-users (61.1%), alcohol experimenters (some recent alcohol use; 22.8%), mild poly-substance users (lifetime use of all substances with less than three days of recent use; 9.2%), and frequent poly-substance users (used all substances three or more times in the past mont… Show more
“…We found that Hispanic and Asian youth were less likely to be concurrent users of some typologies than White adolescents (A+C and A+M+C) and null effects for the other typologies (A+M, M+C). These findings contradict previous research suggesting that Hispanic youth are at higher risk for concurrent use than their White peers (Connell et al, 2009; Gilreath et al, 2014; Gilreath et al, 2015), as well as research suggesting Asian youth are at lower risk for A+M and M+C than Whites and other racial/ethnic groups (Lanza et al, 2010; Ramo et al, 2012). Native American youth were found not to differ from Whites on use of any concurrent substance-use typology.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In general, male adolescents report higher rates of daily alcohol, marijuana, and cigarette use than female adolescents (Lanza et al, 2015; Miech et al, 2016). As for concurrent use, the most consistent sex effect has been found for occasional concurrent users (i.e., lifetime users of alcohol, marijuana and cigarettes, with little recent concurrent use), who are more likely to be female than male (Connell et al, 2010; Gilreath et al, 2014; Gilreath et al, 2015). However, findings have been mixed regarding sex differences in the frequent/recent use of alcohol, marijuana and cigarettes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, findings have been mixed regarding sex differences in the frequent/recent use of alcohol, marijuana and cigarettes. Gilreath et al (2014) and Gilreath et al (2015) found that males were more likely to be frequent/current users of A+M+C than females, whereas Connell et al (2010) found the opposite sex effect. Sex differences have also been equivocal regarding M+C use (Ramo et al, 2012); whereas some studies have found that male adolescents are more likely to be M+C users than females (Guxens et al, 2007; Victoir et al, 2007), others have found the opposite sex effect (Lanza et al, 2015; Suris et al, 2007), or no sex effect (Aung et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers have noted no difference in substance use typology between White and Hispanic adolescents (Lanza et al, 2010), whereas several others have suggested that Hispanic youth are more likely to be concurrent substance users than Whites (Connell et al, 2009; Gilreath et al, 2014; Gilreath et al, 2015). Among African American adolescents, several studies have documented a lower prevalence of concurrent substance use compared to White adolescents (Connell et al, 2009; Gilreath et al, 2015; Lanza et al, 2010; Tomczyk et al, 2016). However, when examining typology of concurrent use, researchers have found variability in risk between African American and White adolescents.…”
Substance use during adolescence is a public health concern due to associated physical and behavioral health consequences. Such consequences are amplified among concurrent substance users. Although sex and racial/ethnic differences in single-substance use have been observed, the current literature is inconclusive as to whether differences exist in the prevalence of concurrent use. The current study used data from the 2011–2014 National Survey on Drug Use and Health to examine typologies (single and concurrent patterns) of alcohol, marijuana, and cigarette use among current adolescent users age 12–18 by sex and race/ethnicity. Participants were 14,667 White, Hispanic, African American, Asian, and Native American adolescents. The most common typology was alcohol only, followed by concurrent use of alcohol and marijuana. Weighted prevalence estimates indicated that adolescent females were more likely to be current users of alcohol only, whereas male adolescents were more likely to belong to all other typologies. Compared to Whites, racial/ethnic minorities had larger proportions of marijuana only users and were generally less likely than or equally likely to be concurrent users. One exception was for African American adolescents, who were more likely to be alcohol and marijuana users than their White counterparts. Results suggest that concurrent substance use is common among U.S. adolescents, making up over 40% of past-month use, but typologies of use vary by sex and race/ethnicity. Preventive interventions should consider all typologies of use rather than only single substance exposures and address patterns of use that are most pertinent to adolescents based on sex and race/ethnicity.
“…We found that Hispanic and Asian youth were less likely to be concurrent users of some typologies than White adolescents (A+C and A+M+C) and null effects for the other typologies (A+M, M+C). These findings contradict previous research suggesting that Hispanic youth are at higher risk for concurrent use than their White peers (Connell et al, 2009; Gilreath et al, 2014; Gilreath et al, 2015), as well as research suggesting Asian youth are at lower risk for A+M and M+C than Whites and other racial/ethnic groups (Lanza et al, 2010; Ramo et al, 2012). Native American youth were found not to differ from Whites on use of any concurrent substance-use typology.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In general, male adolescents report higher rates of daily alcohol, marijuana, and cigarette use than female adolescents (Lanza et al, 2015; Miech et al, 2016). As for concurrent use, the most consistent sex effect has been found for occasional concurrent users (i.e., lifetime users of alcohol, marijuana and cigarettes, with little recent concurrent use), who are more likely to be female than male (Connell et al, 2010; Gilreath et al, 2014; Gilreath et al, 2015). However, findings have been mixed regarding sex differences in the frequent/recent use of alcohol, marijuana and cigarettes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, findings have been mixed regarding sex differences in the frequent/recent use of alcohol, marijuana and cigarettes. Gilreath et al (2014) and Gilreath et al (2015) found that males were more likely to be frequent/current users of A+M+C than females, whereas Connell et al (2010) found the opposite sex effect. Sex differences have also been equivocal regarding M+C use (Ramo et al, 2012); whereas some studies have found that male adolescents are more likely to be M+C users than females (Guxens et al, 2007; Victoir et al, 2007), others have found the opposite sex effect (Lanza et al, 2015; Suris et al, 2007), or no sex effect (Aung et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers have noted no difference in substance use typology between White and Hispanic adolescents (Lanza et al, 2010), whereas several others have suggested that Hispanic youth are more likely to be concurrent substance users than Whites (Connell et al, 2009; Gilreath et al, 2014; Gilreath et al, 2015). Among African American adolescents, several studies have documented a lower prevalence of concurrent substance use compared to White adolescents (Connell et al, 2009; Gilreath et al, 2015; Lanza et al, 2010; Tomczyk et al, 2016). However, when examining typology of concurrent use, researchers have found variability in risk between African American and White adolescents.…”
Substance use during adolescence is a public health concern due to associated physical and behavioral health consequences. Such consequences are amplified among concurrent substance users. Although sex and racial/ethnic differences in single-substance use have been observed, the current literature is inconclusive as to whether differences exist in the prevalence of concurrent use. The current study used data from the 2011–2014 National Survey on Drug Use and Health to examine typologies (single and concurrent patterns) of alcohol, marijuana, and cigarette use among current adolescent users age 12–18 by sex and race/ethnicity. Participants were 14,667 White, Hispanic, African American, Asian, and Native American adolescents. The most common typology was alcohol only, followed by concurrent use of alcohol and marijuana. Weighted prevalence estimates indicated that adolescent females were more likely to be current users of alcohol only, whereas male adolescents were more likely to belong to all other typologies. Compared to Whites, racial/ethnic minorities had larger proportions of marijuana only users and were generally less likely than or equally likely to be concurrent users. One exception was for African American adolescents, who were more likely to be alcohol and marijuana users than their White counterparts. Results suggest that concurrent substance use is common among U.S. adolescents, making up over 40% of past-month use, but typologies of use vary by sex and race/ethnicity. Preventive interventions should consider all typologies of use rather than only single substance exposures and address patterns of use that are most pertinent to adolescents based on sex and race/ethnicity.
“…20 On the other hand, it may represent a standard, welldocumented class of polysubstance users who have simply extended their use of drugs to a new device. [21][22][23] Furthermore, the heightened use of nicotine in this group warrants future analysis to examine whether their level of nicotine inhaled reaches that of their peers who use cigarettes. A third limitation is that the study lacks information on youth who have vaped multiple, different substances within the past 30 days.…”
Objective
To examine what substances U.S. youth vape.
Methods
Data come from Monitoring the Future, an annual, nationally-representative survey of U.S. 12th, 10th, and 8th grade students. Respondents reported what substance they vaped the last time they used a vaporizer such as an e-cigarette.
Results
Among students who had ever used a vaporizer, 65–66% last used “just flavoring” in 12th, in 10th, and in 8th grade, more than all other responses combined. In all three grades the percentage using “just flavoring” was above 57% for males, females, African-Americans, Hispanics, whites, and students both and without a parent with a college degree. Nicotine use came in a distant second, at about 20% in 12th and 10th grade and 13% in 8th grade. Taking into account youth who vaped nicotine at last use increases national estimates of tobacco/nicotine prevalence in the past 30 days by 24%–38% above and beyond cigarette smoking, which is substantial but far less than estimates that assume all vaporizer users inhale nicotine.
Conclusions
These results challenge the common assumption that all vaporizer users inhale nicotine. They (a) call into question the designation of vaporizers and e-cigarettes as ENDS (“Electronic Nicotine Delivery System”), (b) suggest that the recent rise in adolescent vaporizer use does not necessarily indicate a nicotine epidemic, and (c) indicate that vaporizer users can be candidates for primary prevention programs. Finally, the results suggest the importance of developing different rationales for the regulation of vaporizer devices as compared to regulation of substances marketed for vaporizer use.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.