2012
DOI: 10.3109/10826084.2012.663276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substance Misuse Prevention and Economic Analysis: Challenges and Opportunities Regarding International Utility

Abstract: Economic analyses of substance misuse prevention assess the intervention cost necessary to achieve a particular outcome, and thereby provide an additional dimension for evaluating prevention programming. This paper reviews several types of economic analysis, considers how they can be applied to substance misuse prevention, and discusses challenges to enhancing their international relevance, particularly their usefulness for informing policy decisions. Important first steps taken to address these challenges are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A second study (Guyll, Spoth, & Cornish, 2012) focused on the prevention of meth use and its subsequent benefits to employers. This study considered the ISFP and the multicomponent SFP 10-14 + LST intervention.…”
Section: Program Adoption: Economic Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second study (Guyll, Spoth, & Cornish, 2012) focused on the prevention of meth use and its subsequent benefits to employers. This study considered the ISFP and the multicomponent SFP 10-14 + LST intervention.…”
Section: Program Adoption: Economic Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En este caso, la adherencia se entiende como fidelidad al contenido, que se relaciona con la satisfacción de los participantes, con el cumplimiento de las prescripciones de la intervención y la calidad de la implementación (Byrnes et al, 2010;Orte, Ballester, Amer y Vives, 2014;Sexton y Turner, 2010). Los programas con buenos resultados en las evaluaciones de proceso presentan tasas de adherencia más altas (Haevelmann et al, 2013), lo que mejora el potencial de prevención en salud, en calidad de vida, en motivación, tanto de participantes como de profesionales, y en el uso eficiente de los recursos (Guyll, Spoth y Cornish, 2012).…”
unclassified