2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01234.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subsite-Specific Risk Factors for Esophageal and Gastric Adenocarcinoma

Abstract: This identification of distinct risk factors by subsite supports the concept that esophageal and gastric adenocarcinomas are two different diseases. Adenocarcinoma of the junction is probably a form of esophageal cancer and should not be coded with gastric neoplasms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to the cancer-specific risk factors, gastric cancer is also caused by H. pylori infection and high salt intake 4, 22 . As to the different histological type of esophageal cancer, esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease and obesity 23, 24 , while alcohol and hot beverages play an important role in the etiology of ESCC 4, 25 , which is the main type in Asia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the cancer-specific risk factors, gastric cancer is also caused by H. pylori infection and high salt intake 4, 22 . As to the different histological type of esophageal cancer, esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease and obesity 23, 24 , while alcohol and hot beverages play an important role in the etiology of ESCC 4, 25 , which is the main type in Asia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarities in risk-factors for adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia and the oesophagus [2] together with the stable incidence of cardiac gastric cancer despite an overall decline of gastric malignancies [3] suggest that these tumours should be separated from distally located gastric adenocarcinomas [4]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional confounding factors that have introduced bias into calculations of the incidence of specific upper gastrointestinal cancers over the past four decades have included changes in the clinical practice of gastroenterologists, surgeons, pathologists, and their staff; 24 physician awareness; and advances in technology.…”
Section: What Are the Possible Confounding Factors That May Influementioning
confidence: 99%