2019
DOI: 10.1108/jgoss-04-2018-0016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subsidiary autonomy and knowledge transfer

Abstract: Purpose This paper aims to explore the effect of subsidiary autonomy on knowledge transfers during captive offshoring to emerging markets. Design/methodology/approach Five longitudinal cases of captive R&D and manufacturing offshoring to emerging markets. Findings The propositions entail the dual effect of operational subsidiary autonomy on primary knowledge transfer and reverse knowledge transfer. For newly established subsidiaries, operational subsidiary autonomy has a mainly negative effect on prima… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While there have been some studies on firms' absorptive capacity in emerging economies (see, for example, Khan, Lew and Marinova 2019), most of these have focused on institutional level issues in the knowledge transfer process. In particular, the nature of the transferrable knowledge (tacit knowledge, such as marketing strategies), the effectiveness and efficiency of technological knowledge transfer, the recipient's learning intention, the knowledge source's attractiveness, and the quality relationship between the source and recipient organizations are issues that the literature has identified as being critical to the success of inter-and intra-organizational knowledge transfer, and require further exploration (Søberg andWaehrens 2019, Szulanski, Ringov andJensen 2016), especially in the context of emerging markets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there have been some studies on firms' absorptive capacity in emerging economies (see, for example, Khan, Lew and Marinova 2019), most of these have focused on institutional level issues in the knowledge transfer process. In particular, the nature of the transferrable knowledge (tacit knowledge, such as marketing strategies), the effectiveness and efficiency of technological knowledge transfer, the recipient's learning intention, the knowledge source's attractiveness, and the quality relationship between the source and recipient organizations are issues that the literature has identified as being critical to the success of inter-and intra-organizational knowledge transfer, and require further exploration (Søberg andWaehrens 2019, Szulanski, Ringov andJensen 2016), especially in the context of emerging markets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ciabuschi et al [2014], Meyer et al [2020]). Deep dual embeddedness may positively affect the subsidiary's influence/power within the multinational enterprise [Søberg, Waehrens, 2020]. Limited knowledge acquisition opportunities in low innovative host countries force subsidiaries to orient themselves toward internal relationships within the MNE network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And the other way round: subsidiaries with low levels of autonomy tend not to generate or disseminate innovations but are rather effective adopters of products and processes developed by the parent company since they have no authority or capability to resist [Ghoshal, Bartlett, 1988]. Lack of autonomy not only impedes their collaboration with local partners [Søberg, Waehrens, 2020] and makes them less responsive to local market needs but also lowers the local managers' intrinsic motivation to show initiative and motivation [Beugelsdijk, Jindra, 2018].…”
Section: H3: the External Embeddedness Of A Foreign Subsidiary Is Pos...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between the autonomy and RKT is also worth touching upon (Palmi e et al, 2014;Søberg and Waehrens, 2020). The FS in the study are characterised by a low level of strategic and operational autonomy.…”
Section: The Reverse Transfer Of Knowledge In Mnesmentioning
confidence: 99%