2001
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.155.8.947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subsequent Sexually Transmitted Infection in Urban Adolescents and Young Adults

Abstract: These data support recent research that has found high rates of subsequent infection among high-risk adolescents and young adults. Contacts of a sexually transmitted infection appear to be at equally high risk for subsequent infection as those with a personal history of infection. Our data suggest that more frequent than annual screening for N gonorrhoeae, C trachomatis, and T vaginalis would be appropriate in at-risk adolescent and young adult populations, including individuals who are uninfected sexual conta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(54 reference statements)
3
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These clinics serve urban areas characterized by high rates of poverty, early pregnancy, and sexually transmitted infections [11]. Entry criteria included age between 14 and 17 years, stated proficiency in English, and no current pregnancy per patient report and clinical suspicion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These clinics serve urban areas characterized by high rates of poverty, early pregnancy, and sexually transmitted infections [11]. Entry criteria included age between 14 and 17 years, stated proficiency in English, and no current pregnancy per patient report and clinical suspicion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although knowledge deficits are among the simplest sources of risk estimation errors, they are not trivial because the published literature on STIs is changing rapidly. For example, research suggests that infection and re-infection rates for adolescent girls are substantially higher than previously estimated (e.g., Jancin, 1999;Orr, Brizendine, Fortenbery, & Katz , 1999;Orr, Johnston, Brizendine, Katz, & Fortenbery, 2001). Therefore, only the most well-informed health professionals will accurately estimate prevalence rates for STIs in this population, exhibiting accurate correspondence of judgments.…”
Section: Knowledge Deficitsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…More recently, however, Orr et al (2001) reported a reinfection rate of 73% for urban adolescent girls within seven months, and 40% of their male contacts also had an STI at seven months. Therefore, using a goodness-of-fit t test, we compared risk estimates to both a target value of 40% (from Fortenberry et al, 1999) and one of 73% (from Orr et al, 2001) for the question concerning teenage girls and to a value of 40% for the question about their male contacts. Using the lower estimate of 40%, we found health educators significantly ''overestimated'' the risk of acquiring another STD t (118) ¼ 11.372, p < 0.001.…”
Section: B Adam and V F Reynamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A prospective multicenter cohort study of more than 1,100 women showed that 13.4% had a persistent infection or became reinfected after a median of 4.3 months (16). In another study, it was estimated that 6% of the men and 10% of the women were infected at 1 month posttreatment (9). The effect of the long PE provided by rifalazil upon the subsequent risk of reinfection could be directly tested and would be of interest to determine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%