1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf02273849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subperiostic lifting

Abstract: Usually in subcutaneous or muscular rejuvenation techniques, work is concentrated on the lateral regions of the face and particularly on the cheek and cervical area. However, results are poor in the temporoparietal area and are virtually nonexistent in the frontonasal area. By making a coronal incision and extending it into the preauricular area followed by a subperiosteal approach so as to free the frontonasal, orbital rim, and zygomaticomalar areas, we can completely mobilize the upper half of the face thus … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To explain the plethora of recent literature on midfacial rejuvenation, it is often said (Center, left) Preoperative three-quarters view of the that although there are many ways to combat a single problem, no single method provides the ideal solution. 20 As with some other authors, [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] but with a different approach, the present work considers that only subperiosteal dissection of the facial soft tissues and upward repositioning allow an efficient, natural, harmonious, and longer lasting result. This technique produces a composite flap, containing all the soft tissues of the midface area, that is repositioned en bloc (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…To explain the plethora of recent literature on midfacial rejuvenation, it is often said (Center, left) Preoperative three-quarters view of the that although there are many ways to combat a single problem, no single method provides the ideal solution. 20 As with some other authors, [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] but with a different approach, the present work considers that only subperiosteal dissection of the facial soft tissues and upward repositioning allow an efficient, natural, harmonious, and longer lasting result. This technique produces a composite flap, containing all the soft tissues of the midface area, that is repositioned en bloc (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…As with some other authors,[ 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ] but with a different approach, the senior author considers that only subperiosteal dissection of the facial soft tissues and upwards repositioning allow an efficient, natural, harmonious and longer lasting result. This technique produces a composite flap, containing all the soft tissues of the midface area that is repositioned en bloc .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…20 Others argue that only subperiosteal dissection achieves adequate liberation of facial soft tissues from the underlying skeleton. 18,[21][22][23] The lower blepharoplasty incision has been a common technique for surgeons to approach the midface. 7,19,24,25 Other incisions include those in the temporal and sublabial areas.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%