2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ppees.2012.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subordinate, not dominant, woody species promote the diversity of climbing plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
32
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In forests with a well-developed understorey, climbing plants use trellises as support and reduce the dependence on lower branches of trees for reaching the canopy (Campbell & Newbery 1993). Hence, the abundance of shrubs/treelets that act as trellises in the low strata of vegetation patches increase richness and abundance of climbing plants (Garbin et al 2012). In our study, the higher light availability and trellis density might explain the high species abundance in small patches compared to other vegetation classes.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In forests with a well-developed understorey, climbing plants use trellises as support and reduce the dependence on lower branches of trees for reaching the canopy (Campbell & Newbery 1993). Hence, the abundance of shrubs/treelets that act as trellises in the low strata of vegetation patches increase richness and abundance of climbing plants (Garbin et al 2012). In our study, the higher light availability and trellis density might explain the high species abundance in small patches compared to other vegetation classes.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Hence, the abundance of shrubs/treelets that act as trellises in the low strata of vegetation patches increase richness and abundance of climbing plants (Garbin et al. ). In our study, the higher light availability and trellis density might explain the high species abundance in small patches compared to other vegetation classes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, cacti and pteridophytes were removed from the analyses due to their very low abundance and frequency in the plots. Sampling was conducted using an adapted cover pin frame approach (Dias et al 2005;Garbin et al 2012): at every 0.5 m interval of the plot, a thin stick (0.8 cm diameter) was positioned vertically, and the identity and the number of times each life form touched the stick was recorded up to a height of 1.5 m. The nine pin assessments were pooled to obtain a measure of life form abundance (number of times each life form touched the stick).…”
Section: Sampling and Image Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the mass ratio hypothesis, dominant species are expected to drive ecosystem processes within the plant community (Grime, 1998). However, recent studies showed also that subordinate species are responsible for important ecosystem processes in grasslands (Mariotte et al, 2013) and maintain diversity in tropical communities (Garbin et al 2014(Garbin et al , 2012. Both species-groups seem functionally important in the plant community but the mechanism generating their relative abundance is still unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%