Subordinate Actors’ Institutional Maintenance in Response to Coercive Reforms

Abstract

Institutional work research shows how actors purposively create, maintain, and disrupt institutions. Failed or unintended consequences of institutional maintenance remain relatively unexplored, for two reasons. First, the role of coercive disruption actors (e.g., a state) has not been fully explored. Second, existing literature takes scant account of power and disregards the resistance tactics of subordinate actors. Drawing on a longitudinal case study of a migrant workers’ union in China, we show how subordinate actors were first able to maintain institutional arrangements followed by a maintenance failure under the disruption work performed by the authoritarian state. This study extends the institutional maintenance literature in two ways. First, subordinate actors can sustain institutions insofar as they collectively deploy superficial deference and hidden forms of resistance. Second, maintenance work is vulnerable in the sense that it is contingent on the systems of domination and the level of pressure exerted by the disruption actors.

The dual institutional work of Lyra's Walk: partisan violence and peace protest in Northern Ireland

“…advocacy, vesting, disconnecting sanctions) aimed specifically at formal institutions (Lawrence and Suddaby, 2006). A substantial segment of the literature focuses on institutional work done in relation to formal institutions such as state enforcement (Xiao and Klarin, 2021). Some recent work has considered more informal institutions or a mixture of formal and informal (Crawford and Dacin, 2021; Kulkarni, 2020).…”

Logic Plasticity and Bounded Custodial Work in Inter-Institutional Projects

“…Specifically, institutional work is limited by the systems of domination and the level of pressure that is exerted by legitimate powerful actors. For example, Xiao and Klarin (2021) showed how some subordinate actors can collectively sustain institutions insofar as they deploy superficial deference and hidden forms of resistance. Subordinates are constrained by dominant institutional structures, but so are the dominant actors who advocate for institutional change.…”

The slow movements: Informetric mapping of the scholarship and implications for tourism and hospitality

“…Often social movements develop faster than the pace of academic research and thus media is considered an important source of knowledge for future research (Galvin et al, 2021). Indeed, media plays a key role in dispersing social movements globally, especially with the advent of information communication technology (Xiao & Klarin, 2021). In this study, we propose a comparison of the content of stakeholder and scholarly literature to identify potential scholarly gaps that the mainstream media may fill due to the nascent nature of this phenomenon.…”