2008
DOI: 10.1134/s1063780x08120052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subnanosecond processes in the stage of breakdown formation in gas at a high pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second important parameter of any spark gap is the pulse breakdown voltage (U br ). In general in the subnanosecond range [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] and as observed in the experiments [27][28][29] analyzed in this study, breakdown occurs at the front of the voltage pulse applied to the gas discharge gap (figure 1). Obviously, a number of technological and research tasks may require dischargers with the highest possible U br .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The second important parameter of any spark gap is the pulse breakdown voltage (U br ). In general in the subnanosecond range [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] and as observed in the experiments [27][28][29] analyzed in this study, breakdown occurs at the front of the voltage pulse applied to the gas discharge gap (figure 1). Obviously, a number of technological and research tasks may require dischargers with the highest possible U br .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Characteristic delay times for high-voltage breakdowns in a non-uniform electric field at a nitrogen pressure of 2-9 MPa are reported in [99]. Analysis of these experimental data, including data on breakdown voltages and discharge dynamics in space and time, suggests that most of the delay time falls on the breakdown formation time τ br because the statistical delay (the generation time of one or several primary electrons) at high gap overvoltages is much smaller than τ br .…”
Section: Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the ionization wave transit times 0.4-0.6 ns approximated the time resolution of the AGAT-SF3M camera [99]. Moreover, the time resolution of the device was decreased because the slit width was increased to ∼2 mm.…”
Section: Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So the electric energy input is considered to be equal to the electron component of the electric energy Q R = Q e . After the streamer bridges the gap, the electric field E is assumed to be uniform in the gap [52]. For a given E, the electron energy deposition rate can be calculated with the equation Q e = σ e E 2 = q e µ e n e E 2 , where σ e is the electrical conductivity due to electron mobility; q e , µ e and n e are the electron charge, mobility and number density of electrons, respectively.…”
Section: Streamer-to-spark Transition Phasementioning
confidence: 99%