2005
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Submerged swimming of the great cormorantPhalacrocorax carbo sinensisis a variant of the burst-and-glide gait

Abstract: 3835Hydrodynamic drag is a primary force in determining the performance of aquatic animals (Alexander, 1968). In a simplified form, it is the force (due to dynamic pressure differences over the body and skin friction) that causes the resistance to motion through the water. It sets limits to the maximum swimming speed achieved by the animal and has a direct effect on the energy expenditure during swimming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We might expect the effect of gases on buoyancy to match the predictions of our model, with the effect only observed over a relatively narrow range of depths for elephant seals and other deep divers. For shallow divers, however, non-neutral buoyancy may increase the cost of horizontal swimming because of body angle adjustments made to maintain a preferred depth (Ribak et al, 2005). Diving seabirds appear to alter the amount of air carried in their lungs depending on the corresponding depth of the dive Cook et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We might expect the effect of gases on buoyancy to match the predictions of our model, with the effect only observed over a relatively narrow range of depths for elephant seals and other deep divers. For shallow divers, however, non-neutral buoyancy may increase the cost of horizontal swimming because of body angle adjustments made to maintain a preferred depth (Ribak et al, 2005). Diving seabirds appear to alter the amount of air carried in their lungs depending on the corresponding depth of the dive Cook et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where k is the induced power factor (k=1.2) (Pennycuick, 2008), g is acceleration due to gravity (g=9.816 m s −2 ) at mean sea level at the study site (latitude 56 deg) (Pennycuick, 2008), ρ is air density (ρ=1.226 kg m −3 ) (Pennycuick, 2008), b is wing span, S b is frontal body area and C Db is body drag coefficient (C Db =0.28) (Ribak et al, 2005). In contrast, Norberg's model considers that profile power is dependent on air speed, and calculates V mp and V mr using the following equations:…”
Section: Flight Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model assumes that once the costs of countering buoyancy have been accounted for, the power required to produce any further speed remains the same across dive depths. This may not be valid if, for example, energy savings from swimming patterns such as the burst-and-glide gait (Ribak et al 2005) vary with dive depth. Indeed this is quite likely, given that the burst-and-glide gait appears to provide energy savings during swimming at elevated body angles, and body angle varies with dive depth (Watanuki et al 2005).…”
Section: Model Criticismmentioning
confidence: 99%