2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2011.04320.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sublingual therapeutic immunization with a polyvalent bacterial preparation in patients with recurrent respiratory infections: immunomodulatory effect on antigen-specific memory CD4+ T cells and impact on clinical outcome

Abstract: cells specific to Bactek® antigens at month 6 in comparison to baseline (P < 0·0001). A significant increase in total CD3+ T cells was also observed (P < 0·05). No significant differences were observed between baseline and month 6 in levels of total immunoglobulins, specific antibodies and B, T or NK cell subsets. A significant reduction in the patient's rate of RRTIs was observed compared with 1 year prior to initiation of therapy (P < 0·0001). The results demonstrate that long-term administration of a sublin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
65
1
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
6
65
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, sublingual and nasal mucosa can serve as an inductive site for generating a broad spectrum of mucosal and systemic immune responses, including also the respiratory and genitourinary tracts [24, 28] with a high degree of efficacy and persistence of the immune response [29]. Sublingual administration of immunogens such as cholera toxin and ovalbumin induces systemic humoral dose-dependent immune responses [28], mucosal antibody responses [28], and an immune-stimulating effect on CD4+ T helper cell responses to bacteria [30]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, sublingual and nasal mucosa can serve as an inductive site for generating a broad spectrum of mucosal and systemic immune responses, including also the respiratory and genitourinary tracts [24, 28] with a high degree of efficacy and persistence of the immune response [29]. Sublingual administration of immunogens such as cholera toxin and ovalbumin induces systemic humoral dose-dependent immune responses [28], mucosal antibody responses [28], and an immune-stimulating effect on CD4+ T helper cell responses to bacteria [30]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation highlights the need for a more prolonged treatment or for starting a new period of 3-month treatment. In a pilot trial using a similar immunostimulant, with a different bacterial composition because it focused on preventing recurrent respiratory tract infections, the treatment period was of 6 months’ duration and had a clinical effect for a minimum period of 12 months [30]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our own studies show that SLI with rMOMP and CTA1-DD protects mice against hydrosalpinx and oviduct inflammation (O'Meara et al, 2014). Clinical trials of SLI with Bactek ® , a polyvalent bacterial vaccine, was well tolerated in patients and reduced the incidence of recurrent respiratory infections (Alecsandru et al, 2011), and sublingual delivery of allergens to induce tolerance and reduce allergies (sublingual immunotherapy; Passalacqua and Canonica, 2011;Passalacqua et al, 2013) is also well accepted in humans. Collectively, these data suggest that SLI is safe in humans and able to target multiple mucosal sites, including the genital tract.…”
Section: Mucosal Routes Of Vaccine Deliverymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Live virus or bacterial vac-tions are the major focus of published clinical trials for oral mucosal vaccination. [580][581][582][583] There are few clinical data on traditional prophylactic vaccines delivered via the SL or buccal route, although studies are registered on ClinicalTrials.gov for influenza, cholera, and HPV. 584,585 Preclinical studies of SL vaccines have demonstrated immunogenicity in mice using viral vectors such as adenovirus-based vaccines [586][587][588] and bacterial vectors such as Bacillus subtilis.…”
Section: Challenges For Mucosal Delivery Of Vaccinesmentioning
confidence: 99%