2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.03.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sublethal effects of imidacloprid on interactions in a tritrophic system of non-target species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the Potter spray tower assay for compounds 8, 9, 10 and 11 were summarized in Table 3. Erythraline (11) was the most potent compared with the other three aphicidal compounds, although its potency (LC 50 , 112.78 μg ml -1 ) was obviously lower than that of imidacloprid (45.40 μg ml -1 ).…”
Section: Aphicidal Assay and Structure-activity Analysismentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results of the Potter spray tower assay for compounds 8, 9, 10 and 11 were summarized in Table 3. Erythraline (11) was the most potent compared with the other three aphicidal compounds, although its potency (LC 50 , 112.78 μg ml -1 ) was obviously lower than that of imidacloprid (45.40 μg ml -1 ).…”
Section: Aphicidal Assay and Structure-activity Analysismentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The most potent compound, erythraline (11), was chosen to investigate the effect on enzyme activities in A. gossypii at 58.80 μg ml -1 (LC 25 ), 112.78 μg ml -1 (LC 50 ) and 216.40 μg ml -1 (LC 75 ). Aphids were treated with the above concentrations of erythraline (11) by Potter spray tower as described above.…”
Section: Enzyme Preparation and Activity Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The influence of xenobiotics on earthworm populations, even at low doses recommended by the manufacturers as safe, can be very different (Alves et al 2013;Uhl et al 2015;Garczyńska et al 2018). In relation to this, there is a need for a broader assessment of the effect of NEO on soil fauna under varying environmental conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mostly they were used to focus on impacts on intra-or interspecific competition (one trophic level; Foit et al 2012a;Dolciotti et al 2014;Del Arco et al 2015;Viaene et al 2015) or on consumer-resource relationships (2 trophic levels) with herbivore-producer (Daam and Van Den Brink 2007) or predator-prey interactions (Barry and Davies 2004;Liebig et al 2008;Englert et al 2012). Tritrophic systems are frequently used in terrestrial research, for example, in plant-herbivore-parasite systems (Bredeson et al 2015;Uhl et al 2015), but few small test systems exist to assess direct and indirect impacts at the population and community levels in the aquatic environment. Test formats include simulations of microbial detritus food chains (producerconsumer-decomposer [Fuma et al 2000;Dawoud et al 2017]) and producer-consumer communities with either invertebrate predators (Barry and Davies 2004) or vertebrate predators (Metcalf et al 1971).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%