2016
DOI: 10.1080/13614568.2016.1152310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subjective video quality evaluation of different content types under different impairments

Abstract: Nowadays, access to multimedia content is one of the most demanded services on the Internet. However, the transmission of audio and video over these networks is not free of problems that negatively affect user experience. Factors such as low image quality, cuts during playback or losses of audio or video, among others, can occur and there is no clear idea about the level of distortion introduced in the perceived quality. For that reason, different impairments should be evaluated based on user opinions, with th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both these factors are known to affect video quality [54]. Outside of the educational domains, better perceived video quality has been obtained when degrading the video quality for cartoons (which have a similar content with animation) as compared with sport [45,60] or panorama videos [60]. News type content, which is also similar in limited movement as an interview in our scenario, has found also to obtain better MOS scores than the sport and panorama videos when degraded [60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Both these factors are known to affect video quality [54]. Outside of the educational domains, better perceived video quality has been obtained when degrading the video quality for cartoons (which have a similar content with animation) as compared with sport [45,60] or panorama videos [60]. News type content, which is also similar in limited movement as an interview in our scenario, has found also to obtain better MOS scores than the sport and panorama videos when degraded [60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…There is some literature that suggests a person’s attitude toward a visual stimulus may affect: (a) their perception of its image quality, and (b) their perception of the stimulus itself (Kortum & Sullivan, 2010; Pozueco et al, 2017; Sullivan, Pratt, & Kortum, 2008). For this reason, we asked participants to subjectively rate their experience of each video clip by asking them three questions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%