1951
DOI: 10.1037/h0063466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subjective status and the equilibration hypothesis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1962
1962
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar arguments have been made by Klein et al (2006) concerning their study on medical teams and by Lyndon and colleagues (2011) in their study investigating speaking up in nurses and physicians. that such a measure is not suitable if researchers are interested in studying the positive or negative effects of status on interactions between higher-and lower-status members, because those effects are based on personal interactions rather than hierarchy diagrams (Berger, Rosenholtz, & Zelditch, 1980;Fenchel, Monderer, & Hartley, 1951;Lenski, 1954;Singh-Manoux, Adler, & Marmot, 2003). According to these scholars, each employee is most likely to have a unique profile of social standings on various organizational and personal status hierarchies.…”
Section: Sample and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar arguments have been made by Klein et al (2006) concerning their study on medical teams and by Lyndon and colleagues (2011) in their study investigating speaking up in nurses and physicians. that such a measure is not suitable if researchers are interested in studying the positive or negative effects of status on interactions between higher-and lower-status members, because those effects are based on personal interactions rather than hierarchy diagrams (Berger, Rosenholtz, & Zelditch, 1980;Fenchel, Monderer, & Hartley, 1951;Lenski, 1954;Singh-Manoux, Adler, & Marmot, 2003). According to these scholars, each employee is most likely to have a unique profile of social standings on various organizational and personal status hierarchies.…”
Section: Sample and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sociologists have suggested many behavioral symptoms a s effects of status inconsistency. Most relevant for our purposes is that status inconsistency is said to lead to mobility striving (Benoit-Smullyan, 1944;Fenchel et al, 1951;Galtung, 1966;Hartman, 1974;Lendecker. 1960).…”
Section: Review Of the Literature And Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has sometimes been suggested that instead of averaging several indicators of status, such as education, occupation, or income, one should consider the discrepancies or congruence among them. This status incongruence hypothesis ( Fenchel et al, 1951) implies that stress is minimal when the status indices are in balance, or subjectively congruent with each other. There are some studies which have a bearing on this hypothesis.…”
Section: Selected Findings On Status and Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%