Subjective self-control and behavioural impulsivity coexist in anorexia nervosa

Butler, Gillian; Montgomery, A. M. J.

doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2004.11.002

Cited by 49 publications

(59 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This finding, in addition to the significant behavioural results (e.g. Butler & Montgomery, 2005;Kane et al, 2004;Rosval et al, 2006), lends support to the idea that behavioural and/or physiological indicators of impulsivity may be able to differentiate ED groups from controls. However, the findings need to be replicated in future research using consistent ED samples and objective instruments, as well as using larger sample sizes.…”

Section: Does Impulsivity Differentiate Disorderedeating Populations supporting

confidence: 75%

“…For example, Butler and Montgomery (2005) found reduced self-reported impulsiveness and venturesomeness in participants with AN, while the results on the behavioural task (e.g. CPT) suggested fast and inaccurate, or impulsive, responding.…”

Section: How Is Impulsivity In Eds Currently Assessed?mentioning

confidence: 94%

“…For example, Kane et al (2004) found that individuals with BN were more reactive to rewards than controls, while Butler and Montgomery (2005) did not find differences on the number of risky bets chosen (Bets 16) between participants with AN and controls. It appears as though the behavioural measures of impulsivity are evenly divided between significant and non-significant findings, which does not allow for definitive conclusions to be drawn.…”

Section: Does Impulsivity Differentiate Disorderedeating Populations mentioning

confidence: 94%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A systematic review of impulsivity in eating disorders

Waxman

2009

Euro Eating Disorders Rev

239

200

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this paper is to conduct a systematic review of the current literature that examines impulsivity in individuals with eating disorders (ED). Studies were obtained from Embase, Pubmed and Psycinfo, and were included if they assessed impulsivity in individuals over 18 years of age with an ED diagnosis and published in the last 10 years. The methodological quality of the studies was rated. Twelve studies were included in this review, with methodological quality varying across studies. Findings suggest that impulsivity is best assessed multi-modally, with a combination of self-report, behavioural and physiological measures. In general, impulsivity was found to differentiate individuals with EDs from controls, as well as across diagnostic subtypes. The current findings have important clinical implications for our understanding and treatment of both impulsivity and eating disorders.

show abstract

Section: Does Impulsivity Differentiate Disorderedeating Populations supporting

confidence: 75%

Section: How Is Impulsivity In Eds Currently Assessed?mentioning

confidence: 94%

Section: Does Impulsivity Differentiate Disorderedeating Populations mentioning

confidence: 94%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A systematic review of impulsivity in eating disorders

Waxman

2009

Euro Eating Disorders Rev

239

200

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Indeed, Butler and Montgomery commented on a similar discrepancy between behavioral and self-reported impulsivity data. 36 Employing a continuous performance task, ill AN relative to control subjects demonstrated significantly faster RTs and more errors (i.e. inappropriately responding in the absence of a cue), indicating increased impulsivity.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Demand‐specific alteration of medial prefrontal cortex response during an inhibition task in recovered anorexic women

Oberndorfer

Kaye

Simmons

et al. 2010

Intl J Eating Disorders

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A response to this number is scored as a commission error or "false alarm." Increased commission errors in this or other similar CPTs have been associated with alcohol consumption, compared to a placebo drink (Dougherty et al, 1999), and with a greater number of suicide attempts , and are more common in individuals with anorexia nervosa (Butler and Montgomery, 2005), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (Epstein et al, 2003), reading disorder (Beale et al, 1987), alcohol dependence (Bjork et al, 2004), cocaine dependence (Moeller et al, 2005), borderline personality (Paris et al, 1999) and schizophrenia (Nuechterlein and Dawson, 1984), as compared to healthy controls. A correlation between self-reported impulsivity measures and commission errors in the CPT has also been reported (Dougherty et al, 2003;Swann et al, 2002).…”

Section: Multiple Psychiatric Syndromes Are Characterized By Impairedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Inhibitory control and emotional stress regulation: Neuroimaging evidence for frontal–limbic dysfunction in psycho-stimulant addiction

Sinha

2008

Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

303

214

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This review focuses on neuroimaging studies that examined stress processing and regulation and cognitive inhibitory control in patients with psycho-stimulant addiction. We provide an overview of these studies, summarizing converging evidence and discrepancies as they occur in the literature. We also adopt an analytic perspective and dissect these psychological processes into their subcomponents, to identify the neural pathways specific to each component process and those that are more specifically involved in psycho-stimulant addiction. To this aim we refer frequently to studies conducted in healthy individuals. Despite the separate treatment of stress/affect regulation, stressrelated craving or compulsive drug seeking, and inhibitory control, neural underpinnings of these processes overlap significantly. In particular, the ventromedial prefrontal regions including the anterior cingulate cortex, amygdala and the striatum are implicated in psychostimulant dependence. Our overarching thesis is that prefrontal activity ensures intact emotional stress regulation and inhibitory control. Altered prefrontal activity along with heightened striatal responses to addicted drug and drug-related salient stimuli perpetuates habitual drug seeking. Further studies that examine the functional relationships of these neural systems will likely provide the key to understanding the mechanisms underlying compulsive drug use behaviors in psycho-stimulant dependence. Keywords fMRI; cognitive control; reward; motivation; affect; impulsivity; decision making; cocaine; methamphetamine The molecular and cellular neurobiology of drug addiction has recently been extensively reviewed in the literature (Di Chiara and Bassareo, 2007;Kalivas et al., 2005;Koob, 2006;Maldonado et al., 2006). Drawing heavily on rodent studies, previous reviews of the neuroscience of drug addiction have elaborated on the role of cortico-striatal pathways and extended amygdala circuitry in shaping habitual and compulsory drug use behaviors (Everitt et al., 2001;Everitt and Robbins, 2005;Everitt and Wolf, 2002;Koob, 2003;Koob, 2006; Address correspondence to: Dr. Chiang-shan Ray Li, Assistant Professor, Connecticut Mental Health Center, S103, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, 34 Park Street New Haven, CT 06519,. Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. NIH Public Access Author ManuscriptNeurosci Biobehav Rev. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 January 1. Published in final edited form as:Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008 ; 32(3): 581-597. NIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author Manusc...

show abstract

Subjective self-control and behavioural impulsivity coexist in anorexia nervosa

Cited by 49 publications

References 15 publications

A systematic review of impulsivity in eating disorders

A systematic review of impulsivity in eating disorders

Demand‐specific alteration of medial prefrontal cortex response during an inhibition task in recovered anorexic women

Inhibitory control and emotional stress regulation: Neuroimaging evidence for frontal–limbic dysfunction in psycho-stimulant addiction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About