Subjective safety and self-confidence in prehospital trauma care and learning progress after trauma-courses: part of the prospective longitudinal mixed-methods EPPTC-trial

Abstract

BackgroundPrehospital trauma care is stressful and requires multi-professional teamwork. A decrease in the number of accident victims ultimately affects the routine and skills and underlines the importance of effective training. Standardized courses, like PHTLS, are established for health care professionals to improve the prehospital care of trauma patients. The aim of the study was to investigate the subjective safety in prehospital trauma care and learning progress by paramedics in a longitudinal analysis.MethodsThis was a prospective intervention trial and part of the mixed-method longitudinal EPPTC-trial, evaluating subjective and objective changes among participants and real patient care as a result of PHTLS courses. Participants were evaluated with pre/post questionnaires as well as one year after the course.ResultsWe included 236 datasets. In the pre/post comparison, an increased performance could be observed in nearly all cases. The result shows that the expectations of the participants of the course were fully met even after one year (p = 0.002). The subjective safety in trauma care is significantly better even one year after the course (p < 0.001). Regression analysis showed that (ABCDE)-structure is decisive (p = 0.036) as well as safety in rare and common skills (both p < 0.001). Most skills are also rated better after one year. Knowledge and specific safety are assessed as worse after one year.ConclusionThe courses meet the expectations of the participants and increase the subjective safety in the prehospital care of trauma patients. ABCDE-structure and safety in skills are crucial. In the short term, both safety in skills and knowledge can be increased, but the courses do not have the power to maintain knowledge and specific subjective safety issues over a year.Trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register, ID DRKS00004713, registered 14. February 2014Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13049-017-0426-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Training to identify red flags in the acute care of trauma: who are the patients at risk for early death despite a relatively good prognosis? An analysis from the TraumaRegister DGU®

“…In addition to the statistical results, however, it is at least as important how these findings can be integrated into the training and clinical knowledge of health care professionals. It is well known that knowledge flattens with time and can only be maintained through lifetime learning [23][24][25]. It is also in the hands of those responsible in the emergency medical services, shock room, and hospital to pass on this knowledge.…”

Best Practice – Beispiel für ein Notfallsanitäterkompetenzsystem im Rahmen der Anwender- und Patientensicherheit: der Reutlinger Weg

“…kombiniert werden. Das integrierte Training von prioritätenbasierter Struktur (ABCDE) und technischen Fertigkeiten ist essenziell für die Sicherheit in der Patientenversorgung [22].…”

Reanimation bei traumatisch bedingtem Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstand

“…Anzunehmen ist auch, dass sich standardisierte Versorgungskonzepte (ATLS ® , PHTLS ® etc.) mit einer strukturierten Patientenversorgung in der präklinischen Phase und eine aggressivere Therapie des TCA vermehrt durchgesetzt haben [6].…”