1969
DOI: 10.1037/h0027745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subjective report and credibility: An inquiry involving hypnotic hallucinations.

Abstract: This paper argued that credibility of subjective reports is in part situationally determined. An experimental demonstration was considered showing that under conditions where report credibility was a reasonable assumption, hypnotic Ss reported previously suggested hallucinations, whereas simulator controls did not. The experimental evidence also suggests that hypnotic Ss are honest and their reports credible across a variety of situations. It was concluded that subjective reports of hypnotic Ss may well corres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experienced involuntariness lies so close to the heart of hypnosis that it has been labelled the “classic suggestion effect” (Bowers, 1981; Bowers, 1982; Weitzenhoffer, 1974, 1980). If so, subjects who achieve high scores on hypnotizability scales in the absence of both subjective conviction and experienced involuntariness may not be hypnotized at all, but rather are engaged in some other activity (e.g., Bowers & Gilmore, 1969; Ruch, Morgan, & Hilgard, 1974). …”
Section: Identifying “Dissociative and “Non-dissociative” Subtypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experienced involuntariness lies so close to the heart of hypnosis that it has been labelled the “classic suggestion effect” (Bowers, 1981; Bowers, 1982; Weitzenhoffer, 1974, 1980). If so, subjects who achieve high scores on hypnotizability scales in the absence of both subjective conviction and experienced involuntariness may not be hypnotized at all, but rather are engaged in some other activity (e.g., Bowers & Gilmore, 1969; Ruch, Morgan, & Hilgard, 1974). …”
Section: Identifying “Dissociative and “Non-dissociative” Subtypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prominent among possible sources of social anxiety (Schlenker & Leary, 1982), are heightened self-awareness and security operations. Biasing instructions (Bowers, 1967;Bowers & Gilmore, 1969), transference (LeBaron, 1976LeBaron, Reyher, & Stack, in press;Reyher, 1977bReyher, , 1980Reyher, Wilson, & Hughes, 1979;Sheehan, 1972) also may be involved. This class of interpersonal variables presents the laboratory investigator with the problem of differentiating between spontaneously forming mentation and self-protective mechanisms (impression management).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here hypnosis seems to offer the investigator a very useful analytic medium. Hypnotic positive hallucinations are not abolished by strong honesty demands as hallucination reports collected under other circumstances are (Bowers & Gilmore, 1969;Spanos & Barber, 1968), and the hallucinations of hypnotized subjects are different from those of subjects who are simulating hypnosis (Orne, 1959;Sheehan, 1977). Hypnotically induced hallucinations seem to possess the same qualities of subjective conviction as those hallucinations observed in the clinic.…”
Section: Hallucinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%