2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10677-011-9286-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subjective Reasons

Abstract: In recent years, the notion of a reason has come to occupy a central place in both metaethics and normative theory more broadly. Indeed, many philosophers have come to view reasons as providing the basis of normativity itself . The common conception is that reasons are facts that count in favor of some act or attitude. More recently, philosophers have begun to appreciate a distinction between objective and subjective reasons, where (roughly) objective reasons are determined by the facts, while subjective reaso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…it does not count in favor of the response) has no actual weight, so we can say that it is disabled. 22 For accounts of rationality in terms of apparent reasons, see Schroeder (2007), Way (2009), Parfit (2011), Vogelstein (2012, Whiting (2014), and Sylvan (2015).…”
Section: Department Of Logic History and Philosophy Of Science Uned mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…it does not count in favor of the response) has no actual weight, so we can say that it is disabled. 22 For accounts of rationality in terms of apparent reasons, see Schroeder (2007), Way (2009), Parfit (2011), Vogelstein (2012, Whiting (2014), and Sylvan (2015).…”
Section: Department Of Logic History and Philosophy Of Science Uned mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alvarez 2010: 24;Hornsby 2008, § 1.2;Parfit 2011: 33-35;Schroeder 2007: 14-15;Vogelstein 2012;Way 2009: 3-4). 7 The proposal is not the dualist one that there are two utterly distinct kinds of reasons.…”
Section: Subjective Reasonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Peter is not Superman, and there is no metaphysically possible world in which he is. 20 Since there is no world in which the facts are as they appear to Mary to be, it follows trivially from (C*) that Mary has 17 For various amendments, see Vogelstein (2012). 18 There are, of course, alternatives to the Lewisian account of subjunctives.…”
Section: The Problem With Counterfactual Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Sinnott‐Armstrong (). Among others who have found this view attractive are Oppenheim (), Vallentyne (), Saka (), Littlejohn (), Vogelstein (). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%