2004
DOI: 10.1097/01.jom.0000117421.95392.31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subjective and Objective Evaluation of Sleep and Performance in Daytime Versus Nighttime Sleep in Extended-Hours Shift-Workers at an Underground Mine

Abstract: Extended hours of shift work has the potential for adverse consequences for workers, particularly during the nightshift, such as poorer sleep quality during the day, increased worker fatigue, and fatigue-related accidents and decreased work performance. This study examined subjective and objective measurements of sleep and performance in a group of underground miners before and after the change from a backward-rotating 8-hour to a forward-rotating 10-hour shift schedule. The purpose of this study was to evalua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
46
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
3
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, task performance decrements in early morning hours have been observed for reaction time. This finding is also in agreement with a number of studies performed under controlled conditions in the laboratory (Monk et al, 1985;Monk & Carrier, 1997;Casagrande et al, 1997;Heuer et al, 1998;Owens et al, 2000;Gennaro et al, 2001;Wright et al, 2002), in simulated shift-work conditions (Fröberg et al, 1975;Colquhoun et al, 1968;Johnson et al, 1992), and in real shift-work settings (Tilley et al, 1982;Hossain et al, 2004). On the other hand, in the more demanding cognitive tasks, time-of-day effects interacted with the task components that were manipulated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the one hand, task performance decrements in early morning hours have been observed for reaction time. This finding is also in agreement with a number of studies performed under controlled conditions in the laboratory (Monk et al, 1985;Monk & Carrier, 1997;Casagrande et al, 1997;Heuer et al, 1998;Owens et al, 2000;Gennaro et al, 2001;Wright et al, 2002), in simulated shift-work conditions (Fröberg et al, 1975;Colquhoun et al, 1968;Johnson et al, 1992), and in real shift-work settings (Tilley et al, 1982;Hossain et al, 2004). On the other hand, in the more demanding cognitive tasks, time-of-day effects interacted with the task components that were manipulated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…They reported reduced performance on the night-shift for reaction time, mental arithmetic, and search performance (Tilley, Wilkinson, Warren, Watson, & Drud, 1982;Hossain, Reinish, Heslegrave, Hall, Kayumov, et al, 2004; Wojtczak-Jaroszova, Makowska, Rzepecki, Banaszkiewicz, and Romejko, 1978). However, performance changes have not systematically been reported in field studies, for instance for serial reaction time, digit symbol substitution, and manual tracking (Costa, Gaffuri, Perfranceschi, Tansella, 1979;Lowden, Kecklund, Axelsson, & Akerstedt, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifteen interventions evaluated a change in shift schedule (39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53)(54) (table 4). Mean study quality was 14.9 (range: 9-20).…”
Section: Shift Schedule Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean study quality was 14.9 (range: 9-20). Interventions involved changes from a backward (counter-clockwise) to forward (clockwise) rotating shift (N=6) (40-42, 45, 48, 49, 53) and vice versa (N=1) (44), switching from 8-to 10-or 12-hour shifts (N=6) (43,46,47,50,51,54), adjusting the shift schedule based on ergonomic principles (39), flexible shift scheduling (53), and delaying shift start time (52). Many changes from backward to forward rotating shifts also increased rotation speed (N=4) (40,42,45,53).…”
Section: Shift Schedule Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Podemos justificar nossos achados não pela variação circadiana dos níveis de consumo máximo de oxigênio e sim, pelo prejuízo à performance que a privação do sono causa aos indivíduos que possuem turnos de trabalho invertidos. Hossain et al (2004) (22) , estudando a qualidade do sono, atenção e performance das atividades realizadas por mineradores que trabalhavam em turno diurno e noturno, relataram em redução na atenção e desempenho daqueles com sono vigília invertido, onde o fator fadiga foi primordial para esta queda na habilidade e capacidade mental e motora.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified