2021
DOI: 10.1177/11206721211046496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subjective and objective clinical outcomes of a new trifocal toric intraocular lens and effect of femtosecond laser cataract surgery

Abstract: Purpose: To evaluate the clinical outcomes and quality of life following implantation of PanOptix toric intraocular lens (IOL) and to compare the outcomes following femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and standard cataract surgery (SCS). Methods: This comparative retrospective study included 79 eyes of 55 patients underwent cataract or refractive lens exchange surgery between April 2017 and January 2020 in Bayindir Hospital and Kaskaloglu Eye Hospital. Corneal (CA) and refractive astigmatism (R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(115 reference statements)
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, existing Panoptix Toric IOL cohort studies identify between 80% and 94.8% of patients achieving spectacle independence following surgery. [14][15][16][17][18][19] All findings within the retrospective study reflect a unilateral outcome. Given bilateral summation, it would be reasonably expected that binocular outcomes will also result in improved outcomes at all distances and would reflect real-world practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, existing Panoptix Toric IOL cohort studies identify between 80% and 94.8% of patients achieving spectacle independence following surgery. [14][15][16][17][18][19] All findings within the retrospective study reflect a unilateral outcome. Given bilateral summation, it would be reasonably expected that binocular outcomes will also result in improved outcomes at all distances and would reflect real-world practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…15 Donmez et al in 79 eyes indicated all eyes achieving 20/40 or better for both near and intermediate distances. 16 Kohnen et al similarly 4234 describe all eyes achieving this level of uncorrected near and intermediate visual acuity in their small cohort. 14 In the absence of significant differences in residual refractive error between cohorts, the difference at intermediate for our retrospective study is likely to reflect the variation across postoperative visit and assessment distance within the practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For example, Nicula et al cited a positive dysphotopsia rate of only 18.8% in their RLE patients, but their self-developed survey was limited and queried only about postoperative “halos and glittering” [ 19 ]. Another PanOptix study described only 1 out of 55 patients who reported “disturbing haloes,” but again their questionnaire was non-standardized, and their population included both RLE patients and patients with cataract [ 28 ]. In general, it is difficult to compare the frequency of reported visual disturbances amongst different PanOptix studies in the literature because of the variety of non-standardized questionnaires used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It demonstrates the accuracy of LenSx and the advantages of small tissue damage, without damaging the cornea, iris, and other capsule tissues of the lens, which also provides an effective location for subsequent IOL implantation. Donmez et al [33] reported that PanOp-tix trifocal toric IOL has excellent refractive stability and can provide excellent visual quality for patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%