2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subject choice and earnings of UK graduates

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
58
1
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
58
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, documenting the substantial variation in graduate earnings, which has increased over time (e.g. Blundell et al (2005), Bratti et al (2005), Chevalier (2011), Hussain et al (1999, Sloane and O'Leary (2005), Smith and Naylor (2001) and Walker and Zhu (2011)). Fourth, documenting the impact of the Great recession on the distribution of graduate and more generally young peoples' earnings (e.g.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, documenting the substantial variation in graduate earnings, which has increased over time (e.g. Blundell et al (2005), Bratti et al (2005), Chevalier (2011), Hussain et al (1999, Sloane and O'Leary (2005), Smith and Naylor (2001) and Walker and Zhu (2011)). Fourth, documenting the impact of the Great recession on the distribution of graduate and more generally young peoples' earnings (e.g.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At first degree level, it is becoming increasingly clear that institutions and courses attended are crucial to determining success (Hussain et al, 2009;Chevalier, 2011;Walker and Zhu, 2011). The Government acknowledges this by including as a social mobility indicator the share of A-level students who are attending the most prestigious universities at age 19, by school type.…”
Section: Trends In Educational Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work is innovative in that, although the empirical literature from the UK has already shown substantial variation in graduate earnings that has increased over time (Blundell et al (2005), Bratti et al (2005), Chevalier (2011), Hussain et al (2009, Sloane and O'Leary (2005), Smith and Naylor (2001), Walker and Zhu (2011)), researchers have not thus far been able to assess adequately how graduate earnings vary according to the university attended. Theoretically we would expect that different institutions may add different amounts of human capital value and hence influence students' success in the labour market.…”
Section: Academic Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%