1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf00535504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subexponentiality and infinite divisibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
217
0
2

Year Published

1980
1980
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 316 publications
(222 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
217
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we will directly use Theorem 4.2. We still have E M 0 < for all > 0, so we only need to check the regular variation of the function g in (9). In fact, we will prove that…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here we will directly use Theorem 4.2. We still have E M 0 < for all > 0, so we only need to check the regular variation of the function g in (9). In fact, we will prove that…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A stochastic domination argument and the fact that, if the Lévy measure of an infinitely divisible random variable has a subexponential tail, then the distributional tail of the random variable is asymptotically equivalent to the tail of the Lévy measure (see Embrechts et al [9]), show that for large z P I * 0 > z ≤ Cz F Z z Therefore, as in the case of the infinite-source Poisson model, we conclude that (65) holds if (73) does. This completes the proof.…”
Section: A Renewal Poisson Cluster Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When α = 0, S := S (0) is the class of subexponential distributions. The subexponential or, more generally, the convolution equivalent distributions are used in modelling heavy-tailed data, such as occur in insurance applications; we refer the reader to [5], [6], [10], and the references therein for discussion and properties. Distributions in the class S (α) for α ≥ 0 are 'near to exponential' in the sense that their tails are only slightly modified exponential.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the boundedness of G/F in Theorem 1 is strengthened to the requirement lim^a, G(x)/F(x) = 0 then the condition Fe£C can be omitted (Embrechts et al (1979), Proposition 1). However this is not so in general, for in some circumstances the conclusion F*Ge£f implies Fe£C, as follows.…”
Section: Note That F(x)+g(x)~f(x)+g(x)-f(x)g(x)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classes ^_ r Sf, 3) are closed under convolution roots (see Embrechts et al (1979) for the first two; the case of 3) is elementary). We conjecture that for each y > 0, Z£ y is closed under convolution roots: F ((I) eif y => ?…”
Section: Theorem 2 Let Fey Gesf and H = F*g Then Limsup^h L2 \X)mentioning
confidence: 99%