1980
DOI: 10.1017/s1446788700021224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On closure and factorization properties of subexponential and related distributions

Abstract: For a distribution function F on [0, oo) we say FeSf if {1 -

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
173
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 258 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
173
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proposition 1 is related to a classical convolution property of subexponential and related distributions; in particular Theorem 3 of Embrechts and Goldie (1980); more recent formulations can be found in Block et al (2014Block et al ( , 2015. In this article, we focus on integer-valued distributions.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proposition 1 is related to a classical convolution property of subexponential and related distributions; in particular Theorem 3 of Embrechts and Goldie (1980); more recent formulations can be found in Block et al (2014Block et al ( , 2015. In this article, we focus on integer-valued distributions.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the inequality on the last line of page 253 of Embrechts and Goldie (1980) is not correct. In what follows we correct (and even simplify) that proof and have it apply to our discrete setting.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pakes [11] or Teugels [12]), we may assume that X, Y are a.s. non-negative. In this case the lemma is theorem 2 in Embrechts and Goldie [4].…”
Section: Proofsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In Embrechts and Goldie [4], Thm. 1, it is proved that if F ∈ L , G ∈ S , and sup x G(x)/F (x) < ∞, then F ∈ S ⇔ F * G ∈ S .…”
Section: For a Pareto Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with the proof of Cline [4, Lemma 2.3(ii)], and half the proof of Cline [5], our arguments take off from the fundamental estimate (5) below from the proof of Embrechts and Goldie [6] that L(α) is closed under convolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%