1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf00297388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subcutaneous aprotinin causes local hyperaemia

Abstract: Local changes in blood flow at the subcutaneous injection site of the proteinase inhibitor aprotinin and its diluent were measured by photoelectric plethysmography. Aprotinin, but not its diluent, caused local hyperaemia in five normal subjects and in five stable and five brittle insulin-dependent diabetic patients, local blood flow increasing by 80%-180%. The duration of the hyperaemic response was shorter in the brittle diabetic patients than in the other two groups, but there was wide individual variation. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, early successes with this treatment have not been maintained [66]; in our experience with subcutaneously-resistant patients, aprotinin has been of no use. The alternative theory to explain this syndrome is that insulin absorption from subcutaneously injected sites is poor and erratic because of variably impaired blood flow [47] -indeed it has been suggested that aprotinin itself may improve insulin absorption by inducing local hyperaemia [67]. Anecdotally, both local and systemic vasodilator therapy has not proved useful [68]; but recently, addition of prostaglandins to the injected insulin has been shown to improve absorption [69], though it is uncertain whether this effect will be therapeutically useful.…”
Section: Insulin Resistance Syndromesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, early successes with this treatment have not been maintained [66]; in our experience with subcutaneously-resistant patients, aprotinin has been of no use. The alternative theory to explain this syndrome is that insulin absorption from subcutaneously injected sites is poor and erratic because of variably impaired blood flow [47] -indeed it has been suggested that aprotinin itself may improve insulin absorption by inducing local hyperaemia [67]. Anecdotally, both local and systemic vasodilator therapy has not proved useful [68]; but recently, addition of prostaglandins to the injected insulin has been shown to improve absorption [69], though it is uncertain whether this effect will be therapeutically useful.…”
Section: Insulin Resistance Syndromesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that two out of five of the subjects experienced hypoglycemic symptoms during the study. This contrasts with the shortlived effect of aprotinin (7,11,12), which also accelerates insulin absorption, in part through increased local hyperemia at the injection site. T h e IRI-enhancing effect of aprotinin extended from 15 to 60 min after the injection, with the peak IRI occurring at 45 min.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…This effect is evident whether increased flow is achieved through exercise (3,4), an increase in local temperature (5), or injection of a vasodilator (6). Some workers attribute the facilitatory effect of aprotinin on insulin absorption to its vasodilatory rather than its antiprotease action (7). This has, however, been challenged (8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The photoelectric technique, however, does not allow discrimination between blood flow changes in the skin and the subcutaneous tissue. Therefore, th~ flow increase registered by Williams et al [9] might well have been an effect of the injection trauma in the cutaneous tissues. The local t33Xe clearance technique, on the other hand, reflects the circulation selectively within the depot area and, thus, shows that blood flow was indeed higher in this area when aprotinin was given with the insulin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…By using a photoelectric measuring principle, hyperaemia in the tissues beneath the measuring probe following the injection of aprotinin has also recently been reported [9]. The photoelectric technique, however, does not allow discrimination between blood flow changes in the skin and the subcutaneous tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%