2002
DOI: 10.1067/mva.2002.120035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subclavian carotid transposition and bypass grafting: Consecutive cohort study and systematic review

Abstract: Our cohort study showed that SCT is safe and effective for reconstruction of the first segment of the subclavian artery. The systematic review suggested that rates of patency and freedom from clinical symptoms are higher with SCT than with CSB.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
88
2
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(18 reference statements)
1
88
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, a prior study and systematic review concluded that SCT compared to CSB had superior patency (84% vs. 98%) and freedom from complications (88 vs. 99%) (16). A potential explanation of these differences is that the aforementioned study evaluating LSA revascularization had a heterogeneous cohort of both patients undergoing TEVAR and patients undergoing treatment for LSA occlusive disease (6,(16)(17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 41%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, a prior study and systematic review concluded that SCT compared to CSB had superior patency (84% vs. 98%) and freedom from complications (88 vs. 99%) (16). A potential explanation of these differences is that the aforementioned study evaluating LSA revascularization had a heterogeneous cohort of both patients undergoing TEVAR and patients undergoing treatment for LSA occlusive disease (6,(16)(17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 41%
“…In contrast, a prior study and systematic review concluded that SCT compared to CSB had superior patency (84% vs. 98%) and freedom from complications (88 vs. 99%) (16). A potential explanation of these differences is that the aforementioned study evaluating LSA revascularization had a heterogeneous cohort of both patients undergoing TEVAR and patients undergoing treatment for LSA occlusive disease (6,(16)(17)(18)(19). A notable difference in our comparison groups was the expected distribution that CSB patients had a higher incidence of CABG, because the presence of a functioning internal mammary CABG is a crucial indication to select CSB over SCT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Another extraanatomic procedure, subclavian-carotid transposition is also an elegant procedure with excellent longterm durability (Cina et al 2002). However, potential aggravation of coronary ischemia during interruption of vertebral and IMA blood flow makes it a less attractive treatment option in patients with CSS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Superior surgical technique is subclavian-carotid transposition (SCT) with excellent long-term results. [16] Also, Cinà et al [18] in their review concluded that SCT is safe and effective for reconstruction of the first segment of the SA and patency rates and clinical symptoms freedom are higher with SCT than with carotid subclavian bypass.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%