2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30411.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subcision and 1320-nm Nd:YAG Nonablative Laser Resurfacing for the Treatment of Acne Scars: A Simultaneous Split-Face Single Patient Trial

Abstract: This case illustrates that dual treatment with subcision and 1320-nm Nd:YAG nonablative laser resurfacing is a well-tolerated and highly effective regimen for the improvement of facial acne scars, compared to subcision alone.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] However, comparative studies of the various devices are lacking, and to date little histologic or biologic evidence has been presented concerning scar remodeling after nonablative resurfacing. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacies and safeties of a 585-nm PDL and a 1064-nm long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser for the treatment of atrophic facial acne scarring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] However, comparative studies of the various devices are lacking, and to date little histologic or biologic evidence has been presented concerning scar remodeling after nonablative resurfacing. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacies and safeties of a 585-nm PDL and a 1064-nm long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser for the treatment of atrophic facial acne scarring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…7 Although ablative lasers, such as the carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser, have been considered as ''gold'' standards for skin resurfacing, adverse effects, such as prolonged postoperative erythema, swelling, and even dyspigmentation, impede their widespread utilization, especially in patients with darker skin. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] In contrast, nonablative remodeling lasers, such as the 1320-nm or 1064-nm neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet lasers (Nd:YAG) [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] and diode (1450 nm) [24][25][26] lasers, and the 585-nm pulsed dye laser (PDL), 27 can also reduce acne scarring without significant downtime, but at lower efficacies. Moreover, although the recently developed technique of fractional laser skin resurfacing has been reported to allow the recontouring of scars, 28,29 the risk of hyperpigmentation in patients with darker skin types often precludes sufficient treatment 30 ; thus nonablative scar resurfacing is still becoming more popular for acne scar reduction, especially in patients with darker skin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goodman reported two cases with facial scars improved by subcision using a 19-gauge needle [19] . Fulchiero et al reported a case with acne scars improved by subcision, followed by further improvement after nonablative resurfacing with 1320 nm Nd:YAG laser [20] . These studies lacked patient quantity compared to our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Für moderater ausgeprägte Veränderungen sind Filler und Neurotoxine in Kombination hilfreich. Insgesamt ist die Wirksamkeit der nicht ablativ fraktionierten Systeme bei der erapie von Falten als mäßig zu bewerten [19,31,32,33,34,35].…”
Section: Faltenunclassified