2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.12.147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sub nm-Resolution Static Measurement with MEMS Displacement Sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the dynamic mode, mass variation is detected by measuring the shifts in a natural, resonant or bifurcation frequency of the structure. The structural response is measured optically [4][5][6], piezoresistively [7,8] or capacitively [9]. However, most high-resolution sensors rely on optical detection [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the dynamic mode, mass variation is detected by measuring the shifts in a natural, resonant or bifurcation frequency of the structure. The structural response is measured optically [4][5][6], piezoresistively [7,8] or capacitively [9]. However, most high-resolution sensors rely on optical detection [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microelectromechanical System (MEMS) nanopositioners have attracted significant interest recently because of their small size, low cost, fast dynamics and the emergence of applications such as probe-based data storage [12,13], and scanning probe microscopy [14,15,16]. Closed-loop feedback control of these positioners is highly desirable if a high degree of displacement precision is required, and such a control system needs an accurate source of position information [17,18,19,20]. However, many of the MEMS nanopositioners reported in the literature are not equipped with on-chip sensors due to the restrictions associated with micro-fabrication processes [21,22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%