2015
DOI: 10.1118/1.4924023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SU-E-I-26: The CT Compatibility of a Novel Direction Modulated Brachytherapy (DMBT) Tandem Applicator for Cervical Cancer

Abstract: Purpose: To examine CT metal image artifact from a novel direction‐modulated brachytherapy (DMBT) tandem applicator (95% tungsten) for cervical cancer using a commercially available orthopedic metal artifact reduction (O‐MAR) algorithm. Comparison to a conventional stainless steel applicator is also performed. Methods: Each applicator was placed in a water‐filled phantom resembling the female pelvis and scanned in a Philips Brilliance 16‐slice CT scanner using two pelvis protocols: a typical clinical protocol … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(i), (j)], has been thoroughly tested for MRI compatibility at 1.5 T recently, generating minimal artifacts compared to the titanium applicators, and also shown to produce acceptable MR images at 3.0 T . With the use of widely available commercial metal artifact reduction algorithms, the DMBT prototype applicator also generated clinically acceptable CT images . Though not published, the tandem applicator is well visible in ultrasound as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i), (j)], has been thoroughly tested for MRI compatibility at 1.5 T recently, generating minimal artifacts compared to the titanium applicators, and also shown to produce acceptable MR images at 3.0 T . With the use of widely available commercial metal artifact reduction algorithms, the DMBT prototype applicator also generated clinically acceptable CT images . Though not published, the tandem applicator is well visible in ultrasound as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%