2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2013.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studying the capability of different cancer hallmarks to initiate tumor growth using a cellular automaton simulation. Application in a cancer stem cell context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We followed the event model used by Abbott et al [1] in their study of the likely sequences of precancerous mutations that end in cancer, to simulate the behavior of cells when different hallmarks are acquired, as previously exposed in more detail in our previous works [20] [27].…”
Section: Event Model For Tumor Growth Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We followed the event model used by Abbott et al [1] in their study of the likely sequences of precancerous mutations that end in cancer, to simulate the behavior of cells when different hallmarks are acquired, as previously exposed in more detail in our previous works [20] [27].…”
Section: Event Model For Tumor Growth Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basanta et al [3] used a CA model based on the Hanahan and Weinberg hallmarks, focusing their work on analyzing the effect of different environmental conditions on the sequence of acquisition of phenotypic traits. In previous works we also used CA to model the behavior of cells when the hallmarks are present and in the avascular phase, with a different aim to those previous works, since they focused on the study of the multicellular system dynamics in terms of emergent behaviors that can be obtained, analyzing the relative importance of different hallmarks [26] [27] and the capability of Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) and hallmarks to generate tumor growth and regrowth in different conditions [19] [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Monte Carlo approaches are used for simulation of system evolution, including statistical predictions of variability. Both approaches have been used to study cell or organism interaction and spatial or morphological pattern behavior, especially for tumor growth, immune cell interactions, and infectious agent dynamics …”
Section: Stage 3 Representing the Biology: Developing The Model Strumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both approaches have been used to study cell or organism interaction and spatial or morphological pattern behavior, espe-cially for tumor growth, immune cell interactions, and infectious agent dynamics. 60,[68][69][70] Hybrid and integrated models. Models in which different formalisms are integrated are valuable when the requirements for capturing spatial and dynamic behaviors differ among submodules.…”
Section: Mathematical Modeling Formalismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, as a survey of these publications also demonstrates, the diversity of topics is remarkable, thereby giving testimony to the versatility of CA modeling as a powerful tool to better understand the theory of biological problems. Biological phenomena that have been modeled as CA include brain oscillations and neural network activities in neuroscience (Traub et al , ; ; Lewis and Rinzel, ; Kozma and Puljic, ; Matsubara and Torikai, ); heart rhythms in cardiac physiology (Bardou et al , ; Barbosa, ; Sabzpoushan and Pourhasanzade, ; Makowiec et al , ); host–pathogen interactions in microbiology and virology (Agur, ; Bru and Cardona, ; Wcisło et al , ; Sinha et al , ); epidemics caused by viruses (Zorzenon dos Santos and Coutinho, ; Beauchemin et al , ; Xiao et al , ; White et al , ); interspecific competition, habitat invasion, and land use in ecology and environmental sciences (Aurambout et al , ; Grimm et al , ; Johnston and Purkis, ; ; Kalmykov and Kalmykov, ; Qiang and Lam, ); and behavior of tumor cells in cancer biology (Deroulers et al , ; DuBois et al , ; Chen et al , ; Monteagudo and Santos, ; Tzedakis et al , ; Dufour et al , ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%