2015
DOI: 10.1134/s002016851509006x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studying structure and determining permeability of materials based on X-Ray microtomography data (using porous ceramics as an example)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6also shows the similarity between two velocity fields computed using FDMSS for an original 3D image of ceramics (Gerke et al, 2015b) and for its subsequent stochastic reconstruction (Gerke and Karsanina, 2015). The resulting permeabilities differ by around 10%, consistent with a more realistic representation of connected pore spaces when using the modified Yeong-Torquato approach.In addition to pore network reconstructions, one can also generate pore geometries with predetermined pore sizes and permeabilities(Karsanina et al, 2015b) using analytically constructed M A N U S C R I P T A C C E P T E D ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 20 correlation functions…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6also shows the similarity between two velocity fields computed using FDMSS for an original 3D image of ceramics (Gerke et al, 2015b) and for its subsequent stochastic reconstruction (Gerke and Karsanina, 2015). The resulting permeabilities differ by around 10%, consistent with a more realistic representation of connected pore spaces when using the modified Yeong-Torquato approach.In addition to pore network reconstructions, one can also generate pore geometries with predetermined pore sizes and permeabilities(Karsanina et al, 2015b) using analytically constructed M A N U S C R I P T A C C E P T E D ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 20 correlation functions…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample after the test is suitable for further use because the method is not invasive and does not damage the material during testing, unlike the mercury porosity method in which the mercury remains in the sample, and a high mercury pressure may entail sample distortion. Previous methods aimed at characterizing the internal structure of porous materials with the use of microtomography were related to specific materials [17][18][19][20][21] and their applications [22] (the studies used microtomography to characterize porosity in terms of material permeability). The analysis proposed in the above articles is similar to the developed method in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous methods aimed at characterizing the internal structure of porous materials with the use of microtomography were related to specific materials [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ] and their applications [ 22 ] (the studies used microtomography to characterize porosity in terms of material permeability). The analysis proposed in the above articles is similar to the developed method in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To verify the newly proposed modified phase-retrieval algorithm and compare it against classical technique, we chose three 3D porous media images of different genesis: artificial ceramic [41], sandstone and carbonate rocks [42]. The choice was motivated by a wide range of porosities within these samples and their relative homogeneity and isotropy.…”
Section: F Samples For Reconstruction and Comparison Between Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%