2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2018.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-difference method Stokes solver (FDMSS) for 3D pore geometries: Software development, validation and case studies

Abstract: Permeability is one of the fundamental properties of porous media and is required for largescale Darcian fluid flow and mass transport models. Whilst permeability can be measured directly at a range of scales, there are increasing opportunities to evaluate permeability from pore-scale fluid flow simulations. We introduce the free software Finite-Difference Method Stokes Solver (FDMSS) that solves Stokes equation using a finite-difference method (FDM) directly on voxelized 3D pore geometries (i.e. without meshi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed by previous studies the accuracy of permeability prediction improves with increasing numerical resolution (Gerke et al, 2018;Keehm, 2003;Eichheimer et al, 2019). To investigate this effect with respect to our samples, we computed the permeability of two subsamples (Ex35_04 & Ex36_02 see supplement material) using an increased resolution of 1024 3 grid points.…”
Section: Permeability Predictionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As discussed by previous studies the accuracy of permeability prediction improves with increasing numerical resolution (Gerke et al, 2018;Keehm, 2003;Eichheimer et al, 2019). To investigate this effect with respect to our samples, we computed the permeability of two subsamples (Ex35_04 & Ex36_02 see supplement material) using an increased resolution of 1024 3 grid points.…”
Section: Permeability Predictionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…To achieve this goal, various experimental and numerical approaches have been developed over the years (e.g. Keehm, 2003;Andrä et al, 2013a;Gerke et al, 2018;Saxena et al, 2017). 1 https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2019-199 Preprint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…) necessary to create a three-dimensional pore space. The subsequent computation of fluid flow through the reconstructed three-dimensional pore space is tackled with either Lattice-Boltzmann (Bosl et al, 1998;Pan et al, 2004;Guo and Zhao, 2002), finite difference (Manwart et al, 2002;Shabro et al, 2014;Gerke et al, 2018) or finite element methods (Garcia et al, 2009;Akanji and Matthai, 2010;Bird et al, 2014). The computed velocity field is then used to estimate permeability (Keehm, 2003;Saxena et al, 2017) and other physical properties (Saxena and Mavko, 2016;Knackstedt et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…necessary to create a three dimensional pore space. The subsequent computation of fluid flow through the reconstructed three dimensional pore space is tackled with either Lattice-Boltzmann (Bosl et al, 1998;Pan et al, 2004;Guo and Zhao, 2002) , Finite Difference (Manwart et al, 2002;Shabro et al, 2014;Gerke et al, 2018) or Finite Element methods (Garcia et al, 2009;Akanji and Matthai, 2010;Bird et al, 2014). The computed velocity field is then used to estimate permeability (Keehm, 2003;Saxena et al, 2017) and other physical properties (Saxena and Mavko, 2016;Knackstedt et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%