2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2009.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on the lift-off effect of EMAT

Abstract: Noncontact with the test specimen is the advantage of Electromagnetic Acoustic Transducer(EMAT), but it lowers the efficiency of EMAT, because the lift-off of transducer reduces the magnitude of alternating magnetic field in the specimen which has close relationship with exciting and receiving ultrasonic signals. The distribution and intensity of the alternating magnetic field at different lift-off values are simulated with the software of ANSOFT, and the relationship between lift-off and received signals is a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, there is a decrease in signal amplitude and SNR with increasing lift-off, although not as distinctly as predicted. It is reported widely in the literature that signal amplitude decreases exponentially with increasing lift-off for EMATs [14], with lift-off values of around 1 mm exhibiting a significant effect on SNR. Although first back-wall echo SNR exhibits a decrease from 35.…”
Section: Sample Bmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As expected, there is a decrease in signal amplitude and SNR with increasing lift-off, although not as distinctly as predicted. It is reported widely in the literature that signal amplitude decreases exponentially with increasing lift-off for EMATs [14], with lift-off values of around 1 mm exhibiting a significant effect on SNR. Although first back-wall echo SNR exhibits a decrease from 35.…”
Section: Sample Bmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The maximum possible lift-off between the EMAT probe and material depends on the EMAT design, material properties, and the acoustic wave frequency [47]. Studies report that due to the requirement of a reasonable signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the lift-off is typically restricted to below 3 mm [48].…”
Section: Guided Waves Using Ematsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huang et al [103] applied ANSOFT FEA software to study optimum lift-offs in an EMAT system producing US waves at 250 kHz, designed so that only a magnetostrictive contribution took place in the specimen. They concluded, that the lift-off of a receiver could be very small, but the lift-off of a transmitter should be around 2 mm to ensure the stability of the system.…”
Section: Emats (Electromagnetic Acoustic Transducers)mentioning
confidence: 99%