2013
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.288.271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on the Forming Mechanism for Second Step on Hollow Rotor Shaft by 4-Roll Cross Wedge Rolling

Abstract: It is very important for accurately grasping stress, strain, and metal flow during the hollow motor shaft rolling, and it is also foundation of forming regularity, rolling force and energy parameter. The cross wedge rolling process of hollow motor shaft was simulated through rigid-plastic finite element software deform-3D. According to the simulation results, the distribution of internal stress, strain field inside the second step of the motor shaft had been obtained, revealed the metal flow ruler for the seco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These methods allow for the production of (most often) semifinished products for further mechanical processing [ 13 ]. They are also used as semifinished products for die forging [ 14 ] or extrusion [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods allow for the production of (most often) semifinished products for further mechanical processing [ 13 ]. They are also used as semifinished products for die forging [ 14 ] or extrusion [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contact surface of the formed material and tools was described by the model of constant friction. Due to the fact that the compression process was conducted in hot working conditions, the friction factor assumed in the calculations was relatively high, m = 0.8 [14,15]. Moreover, it was assumed that the heat transfer coefficient for the couple material–tools was equal 20 kW/(m 2 ·K), whereas for material–environment, it was 0.35 kW/(m 2 ·K).…”
Section: Subject Of Studymentioning
confidence: 99%